Kline v. Pub. Defender for the Fourth Judicial Circuit

• Decision Date: 26 February 2021
• Docket Number: No. 1D20-3268,1D20-3268
• Citation: 312 So.3d 550 (Mem)
• Parties: Scott Alan KLINE, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR the FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT and Adam Beaugh, Respondents.
• Court: Florida District Court of Appeals

312 So.3d 550 (Mem)

Scott Alan KLINE, Petitioner,

v.PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR the FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT and Adam Beaugh, Respondents.

No. 1D20-3268

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 26, 2021

Scott Alan Kline, pro se, Petitioner.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED. See S.J. v. Thomas , 233 So. 3d 490, 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (noting petition will be dismissed if factually insufficient to demonstrate a preliminary basis for relief); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.070 (stating procedure and timetable for serving complaint on defendants); Clark v. Nichols M. N. P. , 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending civil matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal).

B.L. Thomas, Kelsey, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.