Knee v. A.W. Chesterton Co., 3832.

Decision Date17 June 2008
Docket Number3832.
Citation2008 NY Slip Op 05557,861 N.Y.S.2d 286,52 A.D.3d 355
PartiesROSLYN KNEE, Individually and as Executrix of ROY KNEE, Deceased, Respondent, v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al., Defendants, and THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

The deposition testimony of plaintiff's decedent showed that he was exposed to gaskets and gasket materials containing asbestos while working on a ship known as the Constellation at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, that dust from the asbestos gaskets was pervasive, and that he breathed it. Deposition testimony of the plaintiff and a second witness from an unrelated asbestos litigation and the plaintiff from a second unrelated asbestos litigation describes work involving gaskets on the same ship, under the same conditions, within the same time period, and identifies appellant as the manufacturer of the gaskets. Appellant was a party in these two other actions and present at all three depositions. We note that one of these witnesses may be available to testify at trial. We reject appellant's argument that these three witness depositions from other actions cannot be used for present purposes (see Berkowitz v A.C. & S., Inc., 288 AD2d 148, 149 [2001]; Dollas v Grace & Co., 225 AD2d 319, 320 [1996]). These depositions raise an issue of fact as to whether the decedent was exposed to asbestos contained in appellant's gaskets (cf. Reid v Georgia-Pacific Corp., 212 AD2d 462, 463 [1995]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Buckley and Renwick, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Howard v. A.O. Smith Water Prods.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 5, 2023
    ...(see Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 123 A.D.3d 498, 499, 1 N.Y.S.3d 20 [1st Dept. 2014] ; Knee v. A.W. Chesterton Co., 52 A.D.3d 355, 355–356, 861 N.Y.S.2d 286 [1st Dept. 2008] ). Howard's failure to specify the exact vessels where he observed defendant's pumps is not fatal to pla......
  • Rogers v. Rogers
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 17, 2008
  • 251 Cpw LLC v. 257 Central Park West, Inc., 3412.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 17, 2008

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT