Knowles Animal Hospital, Inc. v. Wills

Decision Date13 June 1978
Docket Number77-1754,Nos. 77-1758,s. 77-1758
Citation360 So.2d 37
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
PartiesKNOWLES ANIMAL HOSPITAL, INC., Appellant, v. Helen WILLS and Howard Wills, her husband, Appellees. Helen WILLS and Howard Wills, her husband, Appellants, v. Dr. Robert KNOWLES, Appellee.

Goldstein & Goldstein and Caron Balkany, Miami, for Wills.

Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Sikes, Greene & Cooper and Sharon L. Wolfe, Miami, for Knowles.

Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.) Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Helen Wills and Howard Wills filed an action against Knowles Animal Hospital, Inc., and Dr. Robert Knowles for injury to plaintiffs' dog, and for consequent physical and mental pain and suffering caused thereby to plaintiffs. It was alleged that the defendants were guilty of gross negligence resulting in a severe burn and disfigurement being inflicted on the dog. Plaintiffs sought compensatory and punitive damages. Jury trial resulted in favor of the defendant, Dr. Knowles, and a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs against defendant Hospital corporation for $13,000.00 made up of awards of $1,000.00 and $12,000.00.

The defendant Hospital appealed (No. 77-1758) and plaintiffs appealed from the judgment in favor of Dr. Knowles (No. 77-1754). We affirm the judgments appealed from.

Following an operation on the dog, it was placed on a heating pad in a cage and permitted to remain thereon in the hospital for a day and the better part of a second day with an absence of care or attention. Severe burn on one side of the dog was the result. The plaintiffs' claim of physical and mental suffering which followed was sustained in the evidence. Thereafter, elsewhere, the dog underwent treatment, and partly because of the effect of that injury to the dog and because of another unrelated adverse condition which developed, the dog subsequently was required to be put away. On authority of Kirksey v. Jernigan, 45 So.2d 188 (Fla.1950), and LaPorte v. Associated Independents, Inc., 163 So.2d 267 (Fla.1964), we hold that the court did not commit err by including for consideration of the jury the element of the mental pain and suffering of the plaintiff-owners of the dog. Additionally, on the evidence the jury could, and no doubt did view the neglectful conduct which resulted in the burn injury suffered by the dog to have been of a character amounting to great indifference to the property of the pla...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • King v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 15, 1987
    ...cert. dismissed, 379 So.2d 204 (Fla.1979) [based on authority of Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 46]; Knowles Animal Hosp., Inc. v. Wills, 360 So.2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (recovery for dog owner's mental suffering allowed where veterinarian left dog on heating pad and dog was severely burn......
  • Strickland v. Kathryn
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • April 5, 2013
    ...(2005); Rabideau v. City of Racine, 243 Wis.2d 486, 627 N.W.2d 795, 798–99, 801–02 (2001). But see Knowles Animal Hosp., Inc. v. Wills, 360 So.2d 37, 38 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1978) (per curiam); Barrios v. Safeway Ins. Co., 97 So.3d 1019, 1022–24 (La.Ct.App.2012); Corso v. Crawford Dog & Cat Hos......
  • Gellert v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 17, 1979
    ...So.2d 406 (Fla.3d DCA 1970); Henry Morrison Flagler Museum v. Lee, supra, 268 So.2d 434 (Fla.4th DCA 1972); Knowles Animal Hospital, Inc. v. Wills, 360 So.2d 37 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). In Kirksey v. Jernigan, supra, the Supreme Court reversed the dismissal of a complaint for damages for mental p......
  • Hayes v. Lisbon Rd. Animal Hosp.
    • United States
    • Maine Superior Court
    • April 7, 2015
    ...veterinarian involving a claim of mental suffering to proceed at the motion to dismiss stage); see also Knowles Animal Hosp., Inc. v. Wills, 360 So. 2d 37, 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978) (finding in an action involving gross negligence "that the court did not commit err [sic] by including fo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Not Your Coffee Table: An Evaluation of Companion Animals as Personal Property
    • United States
    • Capital University Law Review No. 38-1, September 2009
    • September 1, 2009
    ...animal owners’ needs, and to reflect society’s values placed on companion animals. The model statute is as follows: (1) Definitions 234 360 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978) (per curiam). 235 Id. at 38. 236 Id. 2009] ANIMALS AS PERSONAL PROPERTY 223 (a) As used in this section, “companio......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT