Knowles v. Sullivan
| Decision Date | 25 November 1902 |
| Citation | 182 Mass. 318,65 N.E. 389 |
| Parties | KNOWLES v. SULLIVAN. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Howard D. Moore and Geo. H. Russ, for plaintiff.
Chas F. Smith, for defendant.
This is an action for money had and received to the plaintiff's use. The defendant is a mortgagee who has foreclosed his mortgages by sale, and who has in his hands a surplus over the mortgage debt. The plaintiff is one of two partners who while the mortgages were outstanding, made contracts with the mortgagor for labor and materials on the premises and filed certificates of liens. The two, after proper proceedings, got a decree of sale and a sale, at which the plaintiff purchased, on May 12, 1900. Later in the same month the defendant made his mortgage sales, which were completed by the recording of the proper instruments on May 21, and later still, on May 24, the lien sale to the plaintiff was completed by the delivery of a deed to him. The defendant knew that liens were claimed, but was not a party to the lien proceedings. He claims the surplus for an unsecured debt from the mortgagor to him. The case comes here by appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Superior Court on agreed facts.
The judgment of the Superior Court was right. The land having been sold under the paramount title of the mortgagee, the lienholders' claim is regarded by equity as transferred to the surplus proceeds. Wiggin v. Heywood, 118 Mass. 514; Telegraph Co. v. Caldwell, 141 Mass. 489 6 N.E. 737; Livingston v. Mildrum, 19 N.Y. 440. The defendant is not in the position of a mortgagee who has paid over the fund without notice of the claim, as in Hardy v. Bank, 175 Mass. 112, 55 N.E. 811, 78 Am. St. Rep. 479. Therefore if the plaintiff can recover without joining his partner in the lien, there seems to be no objection to his recovering in an action for money had and received. That action is warranted apart from actual contract if the plaintiff has an equitable title to the money or a part of it. Mattel v. Conant, 156 Mass. 418, 422, 31 N.E. 487; McCabe v. Maguire (Mass.) 65 N.E. 162. The difficulties hinted at in Cook v. Basley, 123 Mass. 396, do not seem to arise in the present case.
The plaintiff by virtue of the sale acquired at least the sole equitable interest in the lien title, and the subsequent execution of the deed may perhaps have been unnecessary in order to entitle him to sue alone. Hart v. Wingart, 83 Ill. 282; Remington v. Linthicum, 14...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
New Haven Savings Bank v. Follins
...First Colonial Bank for Say. v. Bergeron, 38 Mass.App.Ct. 136, 646 N.E.2d 758, 759 (1995) (citing, inter alia, Knowles v. Sullivan, 182 Mass. 318, 319, 65 N.E. 389 (1902), Dennett v. Perkins, 214 Mass. 449, 451, 101 N.E. 994 (1913), Pilok v. Bednarski, 230 Mass. 56, 58, 119 N.E. 360 (1918))......
-
In re Balser, Case No. 10-17292-JNF
...or junior lienholder held an equitable lien which was transferred to any surplus proceeds after the foreclosure sale. Knowles v. Sullivan, 182 Mass. 318, 319 (1902); Wiggin v. Heywood, 118 Mass. 514 (1875). By virtue of the foreclosure sale, Ford, as the second mortgagee, acquired the equit......
-
Converse v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
...an action for money had and received could not have been maintained if seasonably brought. Looney v. Looney, 116 Mass. 283 . Knowles v. Sullivan, 182 Mass. 318 . v. Werby, 280 Mass. 157 . Evatt v. Willard D. Martin, Inc. 302 Mass. 414 . There was no error in dismissing the bill against the ......
-
Gray v. McClellan
... ... A ... foreclosure would transfer the liens to the entire net ... proceeds in the hands of the mortgagee. Knowles v ... Sullivan, 182 Mass. 318, 65 N.E. 389; Hunneman v ... Lowell Institution for Savings, 205 Mass. 441, 91 N.E ... 526. It follows that if ... ...