Knowles-Zeswitz Music, Inc. v. Cara, KNOWLES-ZESWITZ
Decision Date | 25 November 1969 |
Docket Number | KNOWLES-ZESWITZ |
Citation | 260 A.2d 171 |
Parties | MUSIC, INC., a Corporation of the State of Delaware, Plaintiff, v. James J. CARA, Defendant. |
Court | Court of Chancery of Delaware |
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., of Aerenson & Balick, Wilmington, for plaintiff.
Francis J. Trzuskowski, of Connolly, Bove & Lodge, Wilmington, for defendant.
MARVEL, Vice Chancellor:
According to its complaint, Knowles-Zeswitz Music, Inc. is engaged in the business of selling and leasing musical instruments and related supplies in the states of Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Maryland, however, the sole area from which it seeks to exclude the competitive activities of its former employee, the defendant James J. Cara, encompasses only specified schools in northern Delaware.
Plaintiff was formed in the latter part of 1964 to take over the business of Knowles Music Inc., a local Wilmington concern engaged in the business of selling and renting musical instruments to school children, the latter corporation having run into financial difficulties. The defendant Cara, who had been a salesman for Knowles Music, Inc. since November 1963, thereupon contracted with plaintiff to perform the same type of services. Plaintiff, which is an affiliate of Zeswitz, Inc. of Reading, Pennsylvania sells musical instruments and supplies through various agencies over a wide area. Until about January 21, 1969, the defendant James J. Cara continued to be employed by plaintiff as a salesman. His duties were to visit schools in the area here in issue for the purpose of selling musical instruments and supplies to school bands and orchestras by dealing with band directors, teachers and others concerned with music in school programs. However, since February 1, 1969 Mr. Cara, having left plaintiff's employ on January 21, has been employed by the Wilmington Piano Company in the same capacity, such corporation being engaged in the business of selling and renting musical instruments and supplies in the states of Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Maryland. Such company, which thus competes directly with plaintiff, has been dismissed as a party to this action.
Plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction banning Mr. Cara from selling or renting musical instruments to certain customers with which he dealt while employed by Knowles-Zeswitz. Plaintiff has also prayed for actual and punitive damages to which it claims to have became entitled as a result of alleged violations by the defendant Cara of a restrictive covenant hereinafter discussed, the latter having, as a representative of Wilmington Piano Company after February 1, 1969, continued to sell and rent musical instruments and related supplies to those schools for which he was plaintiff's sole representative during the last year of his employment by plaintiff.
Plaintiff bases its claim for injunctive relief on the terms of the contract of employment which was entered into between the present parties on October 3, 1964. The meaning and force of which, the parties agree, is to be governed by the law of Delaware. Paragraph 10 of such contract provides in part as follows:
As noted above, Cara was hired by plaintiff as a commission salesman of musical instruments for music students and band members at the schools in question, and it is conceded that Mr. Cara since February 1, 1969 has held a similar position with the Wilmington Piano Company, being engaged in selling and renting musical instruments and supplies to students at the same schools at which he served as plaintiff's representative. Thus, the issues to be decided are first, whether or not the covenant not to compete found in Paragraph 10 of the contract here in issue is subject to enforcement by injunction and second, the damages, if any, suffered by plaintiff as the result of defendant's breach of the covenant should it be held be enforceable.
Defendant argues: (1) that plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law; (2) that plaintiff breached the agreement by failure to treat defendant as an employee during the summer of 1965, and (3) that the terms of Paragraph 10 above are unreasonably restrictive and are, accordingly, void.
Defendant's first contention is based on a damage provision clause found in paragraph 10 of the contract. This clause provides inter alia that '* * * in the case of any default on the part of Cara in performance of any of the terms and conditions set forth in paragraph 10 * * *' that the latter will confess judgment '* * * in favor of Knowles-Zeswitz for the just sum of $5,000 * * *'.
Defendant...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Curtis 1000, Inc. v. Youngblade
...competition may cause," citing Capital Bakers, Inc. v. Leahy, 20 Del.Ch. 407, 178 A. 648, 649 (1935)); Knowles-Zeswitz Music, Inc. v. Cara, 260 A.2d 171, 174 (Del.Ch.1969) (also citing the standard from Capital Bakers). As under Iowa law, under Delaware law, such covenants are subjected to ......
-
Szomjassy v. Ohm Corp.
...date. Delaware law limits the parameters of time restrictions to no more than two years. See id.; and see Knowles-Zeswitz Music, Inc. v. Cara, 260 A.2d 171, 175 (Del.Ch.1969). Under the defendants' methodology, the court finds that the covenant is overly broad as to its time restrictions. T......
-
Yeiser Research & Dev. LLC v. Teknor Apex Co.
...16–1 at 22), Delaware law will enforce a restrictive covenant to the extent it is reasonable to do so. See Knowles–Zeswitz Music, Inc. v. Cara , 260 A.2d 171, 175 (Del. Ch. 1969) ; see also RHIS, Inc. v. Boyce , No. 18924, 2001 WL 1192203, at *6 (Del. Ch. Sept. 26, 2001) (Under Delaware law......
-
Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc. v. Rogers
...not to enforce a distinctly separable part of a covenant in order to render the provision enforceable"); See Knowles-Zeswitz Music, Inc. v. Clara, 260 A.2d 171, 175 (Del. Ch. 1969) (indicating that Delaware law allows courts to modify or rewrite a covenant not to compete in order to make it......
-
U.S. And E.U. Non-Competition Agreements Compared And Contrasted
...Carriage, Inc. v. Berryman, No. C.A. 20574-NC, 2004 WL 835886, at *10 (Del. Ch. Apr. 15, 2004). 4 Knowles-Zeswitz Music, Inc. v. Cara, 260 A.2d 171, 175 (Del. Ch. 5 Diodes, Inc. v. Franzen, 260 Cal. App. 2d 244, 255 (1968). 6 D'Sa, v. Playhut, Inc., 85 Cal. App. 4th at 935. 7 Northern Virgi......