Koeppel v. Carlandia Corporation, 2004-00464.

Decision Date06 September 2005
Docket Number2004-00464.,2004-00461.
Citation800 N.Y.S.2d 607,2005 NY Slip Op 06587,21 A.D.3d 884
PartiesROBERTA L. KOEPPEL et al., Appellants, v. CARLANDIA CORPORATION et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of a judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

We agree with the Supreme Court that this action is barred by the six-year statute of limitations applicable to an action to foreclose a mortgage (see CPLR 213 [4]). The six-year statute of limitations began to run upon the acceleration of the mortgage debt (see Notarnicola v. Lafayette Farms, 288 AD2d 198 [2001]; EMC Mtge. Corp. v. Patella, 279 AD2d 604 [2001]; Loiacono v. Goldberg, 240 AD2d 476, 477 [1997]; see also Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v. Mebane, 208 AD2d 892 [1994]; Thompson v. Willson, 183 Misc 949, 952 [1944], affd 269 App Div 829 [1945]), and expired before the commencement of this action on May 21, 2003.

The parties' remaining contentions are either without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination.

H. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Eitani
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 8, 2017
    ...debt owed by the defendant Eitani (see Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Burke, 94 A.D.3d 980, 982, 943 N.Y.S.2d 540 ; Koeppel v. Carlandia Corp., 21 A.D.3d 884, 884, 800 N.Y.S.2d 607 ; EMC Mtge. Corp. v. Smith, 18 A.D.3d 602, 603, 796 N.Y.S.2d 364 ; Clayton Natl. v. Guldi, 307 A.D.2d 982, 982, 763......
  • Bank of N.Y. v. Hutchinson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • September 18, 2017
    ...Bank, N.A. v. Burke, 94 A.D.3d at 982, 943 N.Y.S.2d 540 ; Plaia v. Safonte, 45 A.D.3d 747, 748, 847 N.Y.S.2d 101 ; Koeppel v. Carlandia Corp., 21 A.D.3d 884, 800 N.Y.S.2d 607 ; Federal Nat'l Mtge. Assos. v. Mebane, 208 A.D.2d 892, 894, 618 N.Y.S.2d 88 ).The election to accelerate the mortga......
  • Beneficial Homeowner Serv. Corp. v. Tovar
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 3, 2017
    ...Patella, 279 A.D.2d 604, 605, 720 N.Y.S.2d 161 ; see Plaia v. Safonte, 45 A.D.3d 747, 748, 847 N.Y.S.2d 101 ; Koeppel v. Carlandia Corp., 21 A.D.3d 884, 800 N.Y.S.2d 607 ; Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v. Mebane, 208 A.D.2d 892, 894, 618 N.Y.S.2d 88 ). The filing of the summons and complaint an......
  • MSMJ Realty, LLC v. DLJ Mortg. Capital, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 24, 2018
    ...v. Patella, 279 A.D.2d 604, 605, 720 N.Y.S.2d 161 ; see Plaia v. Safonte, 45 A.D.3d 747, 748, 847 N.Y.S.2d 101 ; Koeppel v. Carlandia Corp., 21 A.D.3d 884, 800 N.Y.S.2d 607 ; Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v. Mebane, 208 A.D.2d 892, 894, 618 N.Y.S.2d 88 ).Here, MSMJ demonstrated its entitlement ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT