Kohn v. Fisch

Decision Date21 June 1999
Citation262 A.D.2d 535,692 N.Y.S.2d 429
PartiesDAVID KOHN et al., Respondents,<BR>v.<BR>HARRY FISCH, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that a party waives the physician-patient privilege by affirmatively putting his or her physical or mental condition in issue (see, Cynthia B. v New Rochelle Hosp. Med. Ctr., 60 NY2d 452, 456-457; Prink v Rockefeller Ctr., 48 NY2d 309; Koump v Smith, 25 NY2d 287; Zimmer v Cathedral School of St. Mary & St. Paul, 204 AD2d 538, 539). However, a party does not waive the privilege with respect to unrelated illnesses or treatments (see, Sadicario v Stylebuilt Accessories, 250 AD2d 830; Zappi v Pedigree Ski Shop, 244 AD2d 331).

In the instant case, the Supreme Court properly determined that the injured plaintiff's psychiatric records were not subject to disclosure once the injured plaintiff withdrew his claims based upon psychological injuries (see, Strong v Brookhaven Mem. Hosp. Med. Ctr., 240 AD2d 726).

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Hogdahl v. LCOR 55 Bank St., LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 23, 2021
    ... ... A.D.2d 338 [2d Dept 2003]; Cottrell v Weinstein, 270 ... A.D.2d 449 [2d Dept 2000]; Kohn v Fisch, 262 A.D.2d ... 535 [2d Dept 1999]). "[A] party must provide duly ... executed and ... acknowledged written authorizations ... ...
  • Jordan-Covert v. Kings
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • February 11, 2019
    ... ... 307 A.D.2d 338 [2d Dept 2003]; Cottrell v ... Weinstein, 270 A.D.2d 449 [2d Dept 2000]; Kohn v ... Fisch, 262 A.D.2d 535 [2d Dept 1999]). "[A] party ... must provide duly executed and acknowledged written ... authorizations ... ...
  • McLeod v. Metro. Transp. Auth.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • May 7, 2015
    ...his psychiatric records were not subject to disclosure because [his] psychological condition was not at issue' “]; Kohn v. Fisch, 262 A.D.2d 535 [2d Dept 1999].) Here, plaintiff has not withdrawn his claims for loss of enjoyment of life, future lost earnings and total disability. Second, Pu......
  • Kohn v. Fisch
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 21, 1999

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT