Kohn v. Kohn

Decision Date17 December 1982
Docket NumberNo. AL-447,AL-447
Citation423 So.2d 575
PartiesMarilyn Joyce KOHN, Appellant, v. Emmett Lee KOHN, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Wayne E. Flowers, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Alexander G. Smith of Smith & Smith, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this dissolution of marriage action, the wife contends that the trial court erred in not awarding her the exclusive use and possession of the marital home until the parties' minor child reaches majority.In light of the extensive joint debts of the parties, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that, because the parties could not afford to keep the marital home, it should be sold.We therefore affirm that point.We find merit however with the wife's contention that she should receive a credit for the husband's share of the ownership expenses of the marital home which she was ordered to pay until the home is sold.The law is clear that

[a] wife who pays all of the mortgage, taxes, insurance, and expenses of jointly-owned property is entitled to credit against the husband's one-half of the proceeds upon the sale of the property....It is impermissible to require the wife to increase the equity of the husband by her own payments ....The wife here is entitled to either credit or is entitled to have the husband pay one-half of the expenses.

Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So.2d 539, 540(Fla. 1st...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Fischer v. Fischer
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 24, 1987
    ...DCA 1986); Delehant v. Delehant, 442 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Monnar v. Monnar, 422 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Kohn v. Kohn, 423 So.2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Price v. Price, 389 So.2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Rutkin v. Rutkin, ......
  • Tinsley v. Tinsley
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 24, 1986
    ...therefore, to require one spouse, by his payments on the house, to increase the equity of the other spouse. Kohn v. Kohn, 423 So.2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So.2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Thus, a person who makes mortgage payments on a home jointly held with the ex-spo......
  • Coristine v. Coristine
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 11, 2011
    ...a generally accepted principle of the law of divorce.”); but cf. Pineiro v. Pineiro, 683 So.2d 148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Kohn v. Kohn, 423 So.2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). ...
  • Hoyt v. Hoyt
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 18, 1984
    ...that spouse is entitled to a credit against the other former spouse's share of the proceeds when the property is sold. Kohn v. Kohn, 423 So.2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). In addition to property taxes, insurance premiums, maintenance expenses, and mortgage principal payments, such credit also ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT