Koplowitz v. Imperial Towers Condominium, Inc., 84-2599
| Citation | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2584,478 So.2d 504 |
| Decision Date | 20 November 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-2599,84-2599 |
| Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2584 Julius KOPLOWITZ, Audrey Koplowitz, his wife; Sheldon Lending and Frances Lending, his wife, Appellants, v. IMPERIAL TOWERS CONDOMINIUM, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, Appellee. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Mark Perlman of Perlman & Perlow, P.A., Hallandale, for appellants.
Julian R. Benjamin of Therrel, Baisden, Stanton, Wood & Setlin, Miami Beach, for appellee.
This appeal challenges an amendment to a condominium association's rental rule. The trial court found that the rule had been amended validly. We respectfully disagree and reverse.
Article X of the declaration of condominium for the Imperial Towers Condominium is captioned, "Use Restrictions." Subsection (f) of this article states, "Reasonable regulations concerning the use of the Condominium property may be made and amended from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Association as provided by its Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws." (Emphasis supplied.) In turn, Article III, subsection 2(e) of the articles of incorporation provides that
[t]he Association shall have all the powers reasonably necessary to implement the purposes of the Association, including but not limited to: To make and amend reasonable regulations respecting the use of the property in the condominium provided, however, that all such regulations and amendments thereto shall be approved by not less than 75% of the votes of the entire membership of the Association before such shall become effective. [Emphasis supplied.]
An existing condominium rule permitted unit owners to rent their apartments "once in a 12 month period ... for a period of no less than 3 months." A majority of the board of directors voted to amend this rule by restricting unit rentals to "once every two years for no less than (3) three months, nor more than (1) one year." As required by the articles of incorporation, the board submitted the proposed amendment to a vote by all unit owners. The result was 136 in favor, 104 opposed.
Despite the fact that the proposed amendment did not receive approval by seventy-five percent of the entire membership of the association, the board took the position that it possessed inherent authority to amend the rental rule. It apparently considered the 136-to-104 vote to be merely advisory. Thus, the board denied two rental applications because the unit owners had rented previously and the new rentals would be violative of the amended rule. The aggrieved unit owners then instituted suit for declaratory relief and money damages. The trial court ruled for the association and its board of directors. The court found that Article XIII of the declaration of condominium, which governs sales and leasing of units and empowers the board to approve prospective lessees, impliedly allowed the board to enact and amend rental rules without the concurrence of seventy-five percent of the unit owners. We respectfully disagree.
The declaration of condominium and the association's articles of incorporation are interrelated documents. See § 718.104(4)(j), Fla.Stat. (1983). They are component parts of "the condominium's 'constitution,' " Schmidt v. Sherrill, 442 So.2d 963, 965 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), and are susceptible to basic rules of interpretation. "Whether they appear in a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Scudder v. Greenbrier C. Condominium Ass'n, Inc.
...of condominium, words of common usage should be construed in their plain and ordinary sense. Koplowitz v. Imperial Towers Condominium, Inc., 478 So.2d 504 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Martin v. Ocean Reef Villas Ass'n, Inc., 547 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), rev. denied, 557 So.2d 35 (Fla.1990). ......
-
Miami Electronics Center, Inc. v. Saporta
...4th DCA 1991); Parkway Gardens Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Kinser, 536 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Koplowitz v. Imperial Towers Condominium, Inc., 478 So.2d 504 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Tower House Condominium, Inc. v. Millman, 410 So.2d 926 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), approved on another ground, 47......
-
Hamer v. Se. Res. Grp., Inc.
...usage, such words are construed in their plain and ordinary sense." (alteration in original)); Koplowitz v. Imperial Towers Condo., Inc., 478 So. 2d 504, 505 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985) ("Whether they appear in a statute or in adeclaration of condominium, words of common usage should be cons......
-
Castellanos v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp.
...“assignment” theory also contravenes Article III, Section 2 of the Articles of Incorporation. See Koplowitz v. Imperial Towers Condo., Inc., 478 So.2d 504, 506 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (where a board's action contravenes the Articles of Incorporation, the act is ultra vires, and “could not take ......
-
Chapter 12 - § 12.4 • THE DECLARATION
...Covered Bridge Condo. Ass'n v. Chambliss, 705 S.W.2d 211 (Tex. Civ. App.—Houston, 1985); Koplowitz v. Imperial Towers Condo., Inc., 478 So.2d 504 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Lake St. Louis Cmty. Ass'n v. Leidy, 672 S.W.2d 381 (Mo. App. 1984) (homeowners association restrictive covenant).[68] Kneal......