Kothmann v. Lett
Decision Date | 09 April 1952 |
Docket Number | No. 10034,10034 |
Parties | KOTHMANN v. LETT et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Lawrence L. Bruhl, Llano, Lee & Lee, Mason, Tom H. Davis, III, Ralph W. Yarborough, Austin, for appellant.
Alfred M. Scott, Austin, for appellees on appeal only.
This writ of error appeal is by appellant, Rubin Kothmann, from a $17,900 default judgment rendered against him on April 14, 1951, in favor of appellees H. J. Lett, his wife Harriet Lett and infant daughter Larry Ann Lett for damages including damages for personal injuries sustained by them as a result of inhaling gas fumes while occupying a tourist cabin owned and operated by appellant.
The transcript shows these proceedings:
Appellees' petition was filed February 4, 1951, and named appellant and the Lone Star Gas Company as defendants.
Citation was issued for appellant February 24, 1951, which was served on March 9, 1951, and filed in the District Clerk's office on March 10, 1951.
The Lone Star Gas Company filed its answer on March 17, 1951.
On April 14, 1951, at 11 o'clock A.M., appellees filed a motion for nonsuit against the Lone Star Gas Company and for default judgment against appellant with a request for a nonjury inquiry into the issue of damages and for final judgment for the amount of damages found to be due.
At 11:45 o'clock A.M. on the same day, April 14, 1951, final judgment, covering more than two pages, was filed.
Appeal from this judgment by writ of error was perfected on August 22, 1951.
No statement of facts has been brought forward, the trial court certifying with reference thereto, as follows:
'Signed and entered of record, and ordered recorded in the minutes, this the 25th day of August, 1951.'
Appellant's first point is that the judgment is erroneous because it allowed appellee H. J. Lett to recover damages for the deaths of his business associates, Leon Lynch and Sylvia Lynch, it not being alleged that appellees were within the class of persons entitled to sue for damages for wrongful death as provided in Article 4675, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St.
Appellant's third point is that the judgment is excessive. Our disposition of these points makes immaterial appellant's other points.
Since a default judgment admits only facts which are well pleaded and the effect of such default is to be measured by the pleadings it is essential, in determining these points, that we analyze the judgment in the light of the pleadings. 25 Tex.Jur. p. 402, et seq.
We quote from the judgment:
'* * * the court finds that the plaintiffs ought to recover their damages occasioned by reason of the premises alleged in plaintiffs' original petition herein against said defendant Rubin Kothmann who is in default; * * * and it appearing to the court that the plaintiffs have been damaged by the defendant Rubin Kothmann in the amounts hereinafter awarded and adjudged, it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed by the court that the plaintiff H. J. Lett, in his own behalf and in behalf of his wife, Harriett Lett, do have and recover of and from the defendant Rubin Kothmann the sum of Sixteen Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars ($16,900.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent. (6%) per annum from the date hereof until paid, * * *.
'It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed by the court that the Plaintiff H. J. Lett, as father and next friend of his minor daughter Larry Ann Lett, do have and recover for and on behalf of said minor child of and from the defendant Rubin Kothmann the further sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1000.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent. (6%) per annum from date hereof until paid, * * *.'
Appellees' petition filed February 24, 1951, alleged that on or about February 2, 1951, appellant owned and operated a tourist court in Marble Falls, Texas; that appellee, his wife and child were occupying one of the courts as tenants on said date; that such court was equipped with a gas stove which was left burning all night. That due to the court being poorly ventilated, damp and otherwise inadequately furnished and equipped that gas and gas fumes escaped from the stove, connections and pipes '* * * causing discomfort and illness of plaintiffs and each of them' and their '* * * health was seriously affected resulting in their serious illness and having to be removed to the Burnet County Hospital. * * *'
The petition further alleged:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mo-Vac Service, Inc. v. Marine Contractors & Supply, Inc.
...S.W.2d 58 (1952); Fitz v. Toungate, 419 S.W.2d 708, 710 (Tex.Civ.App. Austin 1967, writ ref'd n. r. e.); Kothmann v. Lett, 248 S.W.2d 302 (Tex.Civ.App. Austin 1952, writ ref'd n. r. e.). McDonald, Texas Civil Practice § 17.23.3 In looking to the petition herein to determine if it clearly no......
-
American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. Corbell
...196 S.W. 276, at page 279; San Antonio Paper Company v. Morgan, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 651, at pages 655, 656; Kothmann v. Lett, Tex.Civ.App., 248 S.W.2d 302, at page 306. 2. Point Two assigns as error that the judgment was premature because it was rendered before the expiration of the ten......
-
Fitz v. Toungate
...which are well pleaded, we will analyze the pleadings of appellee to determine whether they will sustain the judgment rendered. Kothmann v. Lett, 248 S.W.2d 302, Tex.Civ.App., Austin, writ ref. Appellees alleged that they purchased and fully paid for a trailer house, above described from th......