Krasner v. Transcontinental Equities, Inc.
| Decision Date | 13 July 1978 |
| Citation | 64 A.D.2d 551,407 N.Y.S.2d 625 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Parties | I. Robert KRASNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANSCONTINENTAL EQUITIES, INC., et al., Defendants, and Ben-Ness Cameras & Electronics Center, Inc., Defendant-Respondent. |
P. Kleinberg, for plaintiff. D. D. Wallerstein, New York City, for defendants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Korn, J.), entered May 23, 1977, denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granting defendant Ben-Ness Cameras & Electronics Center, Inc. summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, without costs and disbursements, to the extent of denying summary judgment to defendant Ben-Ness Cameras & Electronics Center, Inc. dismissing the complaint and the motion denied in all respects without prejudice to renewal upon proper papers which shall include a copy of the pleadings, and otherwise affirmed. CPLR 3212(b) provides that a motion for summary judgment shall be supported by a copy of the pleadings. The pleadings are a requisite part of the record of a CPLR 3212 motion (See, Weinstein-Korn-Miller: New York Civil Practice Section 3212.10). Not only are the pleadings not part of the record of the instant motion, they appear to have not as yet been filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wash. Realty Owners, LLC v. 260 Wash. St., LLC
...N.Y.S.2d 192 [3d Dept. 2004];Welton v. Drobnicki, 298 A.D.2d 757, 749 N.Y.S.2d 288 [3d Dept. 2002];Krasner v. Transcontinental Equities, 64 A.D.2d 551, 407 N.Y.S.2d 625 [1st Dept. 1978] ). In light of the foregoing, we do not consider the remaining [105 A.D.3d 676]contentions with regard to......
-
Weinstein v. Gindi
...for summary judgment ( see e.g. Hamilton v. City of New York, 262 A.D.2d 283, 691 N.Y.S.2d 108 [1999]; Krasner v. Transcontinental Equities, 64 A.D.2d 551, 407 N.Y.S.2d 625 [1978] ). In any event, even assuming that defendant had otherwise met his prima facie burden on the motion, Pine Proj......
-
Mouta v. Essex Mkt. Dev. LLC
...the denial of Essex's motion, without prejudice to renewal upon proper papers ( see Krasner v. Transcontinental Equities, 64 A.D.2d 551, 407 N.Y.S.2d 625 [1st Dept. 1978] ). The court correctly denied JF's motion as to the insurance policies procured by Marangos and Essex. The Decision and ......
- Krasner v. Transcontinental Equities, Inc.