Krauth v. Richmond Memorial Hosp.
Decision Date | 31 October 1963 |
Parties | , 194 N.E.2d 133 Felix KRAUTH, Appellant, v. RICHMOND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Respondent. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Patient brought a malpractice action against hospital because of failure of hospital to take X-rays which would have disclosed that injured toe was broken.
The Supreme Court, Trial Term, New York County, Thomas C. Chimera, J., entered a judgment in favor of the hospital, and the patient appealed.
The Appellate Division, by a divided court, affirmed the judgment.
The patient appealed to the Court of Appeals, contending that there was a question of fact as to malpractice, and that there was a question of fact whether the ultimate condition of the patient was a consequence of the alleged malpractice, and that it was error to dismiss the complaint on ground that the patient's failure to see a physician sooner absolved the hospital from its alleged malpractice. Tenzer & Golden, Mineola (Benjamin H. Siff, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.
George J. Conway, New York City (Lillian E. Cuff, Kew Gardens, of counsel), for defendant-respondent.
Judgment affirmed, without costs.
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sorkin v. Lee
...because of any medical condition of the mother (see Prosser, Torts (4th ed.), § 65, pp. 422-424; see also Krauth v. Richmond Mem. Hosp., 13 N.Y.2d 949, 244 N.Y.S.2d 318, 194 N.E.2d 133; cf. DuBois v. Decker, 130 N.Y. 325, 29 N.E. 313; Carpenter v. Blake, 75 N.Y. The dissenter contends that ......
-
Caiazzo v. VOLKSWAGENWERK, AG
... ... See Krauth v. Richmond Memorial Hospital, 1st Dept.1963, 18 A.D.2d 908, aff'd 1963, ... ...
- People v. Knight