Krauth v. Richmond Memorial Hosp.

Decision Date31 October 1963
Parties, 194 N.E.2d 133 Felix KRAUTH, Appellant, v. RICHMOND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Patient brought a malpractice action against hospital because of failure of hospital to take X-rays which would have disclosed that injured toe was broken.

The Supreme Court, Trial Term, New York County, Thomas C. Chimera, J., entered a judgment in favor of the hospital, and the patient appealed.

The Appellate Division, by a divided court, affirmed the judgment.

The patient appealed to the Court of Appeals, contending that there was a question of fact as to malpractice, and that there was a question of fact whether the ultimate condition of the patient was a consequence of the alleged malpractice, and that it was error to dismiss the complaint on ground that the patient's failure to see a physician sooner absolved the hospital from its alleged malpractice. Tenzer & Golden, Mineola (Benjamin H. Siff, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

George J. Conway, New York City (Lillian E. Cuff, Kew Gardens, of counsel), for defendant-respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Sorkin v. Lee
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 23 Diciembre 1980
    ...because of any medical condition of the mother (see Prosser, Torts (4th ed.), § 65, pp. 422-424; see also Krauth v. Richmond Mem. Hosp., 13 N.Y.2d 949, 244 N.Y.S.2d 318, 194 N.E.2d 133; cf. DuBois v. Decker, 130 N.Y. 325, 29 N.E. 313; Carpenter v. Blake, 75 N.Y. The dissenter contends that ......
  • Caiazzo v. VOLKSWAGENWERK, AG
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 19 Marzo 1979
    ... ... See Krauth v. Richmond Memorial Hospital, 1st Dept.1963, 18 A.D.2d 908, aff'd 1963, ... ...
  • People v. Knight
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 31 Octubre 1963

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT