Kreger v. Twp. of Bismarck

Decision Date30 October 1894
Citation59 Minn. 3,60 N.W. 675
PartiesKREGER v. TOWNSHIP OF BISMARCK.
CourtMinnesota Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

(Syllabus by the Court.)

As a town is not liable for the illegal or unauthorized acts of its officers, though done colore officii, it is necessary to allege or show in a complaint, in an action brought against such town for damages caused by the acts of its officers, that such acts were within the scope of their power or authority.

Appeal from district court, Sibley county; Francis Cadwell, Judge.

Action by August Kreger against the township of Bismarck, Sibley county. Verdict for defendant. From an order refusing a new trial, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Thos. Hessian and Geo. A. McKenzie, for appellant.

W. H. Leeman and Ed. H. Huebner, for respondent.

COLLINS, J.

It was not alleged or shown by the complaint in this action that the ditches in which plaintiff claims surface waters were accumulated, and from thence cast upon his land, to its great injury, were dug by defendant's supervisors within the limits of a highway. In fact, it may fairly be inferred from the pleading that, for the purpose of improving certain public roads, the supervisors entered upon private property, and there constructed the ditches in question. A town is without authority to ditch upon such property, except as the right may be acquired under the provisions of Gen. St. 1878, c. 13, §§ 101-108. Its supervisors could not in an official capacity do what it was not lawfully authorized to do; hence a town is not liable for the illegal or unauthorized acts of its officers, though done colore officii, unless it previously authorized or subsequently ratified such acts. As the complaint failed to allege or show that the acts complained of were performed by the supervisors within the scope of their power or authority, no cause of action was stated against the town. Order affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Gabler v. Bertha Tp.
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • December 31, 1926
    ...are the agents of the town, and the town is liable for their acts, unless they were illegal or unauthorized (Kreger v. Bismarck Township, 59 Minn. 3, 60 N. W. 675). A town board is not obliged to go in a body to supervise the grading of a road. Supervision of the work calls for ministerial ......
  • Kohlhase v. Town of Bertha
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • February 28, 1908
    ... ... was not binding upon the town. Kreger v. Bismark ... Township, 59 Minn. 3, 60 N.W. 675. There is a total lack ... of evidence in the ... ...
  • Kreger v. Bismarck Township
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • October 30, 1894
  • Kreger v. Bismarck Township
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • October 30, 1894
    ...within the scope of their power or authority, no cause of action was stated against the town. Order affirmed. (Opinion published 60 N. W. 675.) ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT