Kresge Co. v. Rankin, 5381.
Decision Date | 13 June 1945 |
Docket Number | No. 5381.,5381. |
Citation | 149 F.2d 934 |
Parties | S. S. KRESGE CO. v. RANKIN. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Oscar J. Andre, of Charleston, W. Va., and Robert B. McDougle, of Parkersburg, W. Va. (Steptoe & Johnson, of Charleston, W. Va., on the brief), for appellant.
William Bruce Hoff and James B. Randolph, both of Parkersburg, W. Va., for appellee.
Before GRONER, Chief Justice, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia,1 and SOPER and DOBIE, United States Circuit Judges.
Laura Rankin (hereinafter called plaintiff) brought a civil action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, against S. S. Kresge Company, a corporation (hereinafter called defendant), for personal injuries alleged to have been received when she was a customer in defendant's store in Parkersburg, West Virginia. Plaintiff, upon the verdict of a jury, recovered judgment. Defendant's motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict were overruled by the District Court, and defendant has appealed.
Plaintiff's claim was based upon a fall, when she slipped upon some whitish, foreign substance in the vestibule of defendant's store. This appeal raises two questions: (1) Was there sufficient evidence of defendant's negligence to take the case to the jury? (2) Was plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law? The District Court (quite correctly, we think) answered the first question in the affirmative and the second question in the negative, in a comprehensive and able opinion (59 F.Supp. 613, 617), to which we believe there is little need to add.
Defendant, in its general store, operated small bars at which, during the noon hour when schools were in session, hundreds of school children were served various articles of food and drink. In the opinion of the District Court it was said: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mahoney v. J. C. Penney Co.
...Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co., 285 Pa. 378, 132 A. 178, 43 A.L.R. 862; Rankin v. S. S. Kresge Co., D.C., 59 F.Supp. 613, aff'd 3 Cir., 149 F.2d 934; Zizi v. Gabriele D'Annunzio Lodge No. 22, etc., 14 N.J.Super. 200, 83 A.2d 334; Randolph v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., D.C., 2 F.S......
-
S. H. Kress & Co. v. Selph, 4738
...226 S.W.2d 501; Langley v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 47 R.I. 165, 131 A. 194; Scott v. Kline's, Mo.App., 284 S.W. 831; S. S. Kresge Co. v. Rankin, 4 Cir., 149 F.2d 934; Anjou v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co., 208 Mass. 273, 94 N.E. 386; Hudson v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 275 Mass. 469, 176 N.E. 188; Fourn......
-
Pogue v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company
...by such cases from other jurisdictions as Rankin v. S. S. Kresge Company, D.C.N.D.W.Va., 59 F.Supp. 613, affirmed in S. S. Kresge Company v. Rankin, 4 Cir., 149 F.2d 934; Moone v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co., Mo.App., 148 S.W.2d 628; and Pabst v. Hillman's, 293 Ill.App. 547, 13 N.E.2d 77. I......
-
Viands v. Safeway Stores
...Blaine v. United States, D.C.E.D.Tenn., 102 F.Supp. 161; Rankin v. S. S. Kresge Co., D.C.N.D.W. Va., 59 F.Supp. 613, affirmed, 4 Cir., 149 F. 2d 934; Sexton v. Brooks, 39 Cal.2d 153, 245 P.2d 496; Flint River Cotton Mills v. Colley, 71 Ga.App. 288, 30 S.E.2d 426 (based on State statute); Pe......