Krevis v. City of Bridgeport, 267 Conn. 914 (Conn. 1/22/2004)

Decision Date22 January 2004
Citation267 Conn. 914
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesJOSEPH R. KREVIS ET AL. <I>v.</I> CITY OF BRIDGEPORT.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 432 (AC 19438), is denied.

John R. Mitola, associate city attorney, in support of the petition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Gosselin v. Gosselin
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 9 Septiembre 2008
    ...judgment), rev'd on other grounds, 262 Conn. 813, 817 A.2d 628, on remand, 80 Conn.App. 432, 835 A.2d 123 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 914, 841 A.2d 219 (2004); Munroe v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 63 Conn.App. 748, 778 A.2d 1007 (2001) (supplemental briefs regarding whether zoning board o......
  • Damiani v. Steiner, No. 483515 (CT 7/11/2005)
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 11 Julio 2005
    ...aff'd, 263 Conn. 22, 818 A.2d 37 (2003); Krevis v. Bridgeport, 80 Conn.App. 432, 435, 835 A.2d 123 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 914, 841 A.2d 219 (2004); Egri v. Foisie, 83 Conn.App. 243, 245 n. 1, 848 A.2d 1266 (2004); Criscuolo v. Mauro Motors, Inc., 58 Conn.App. 537, 545, 754 A.2d 810......
  • Worth Constr. Co. v. Dep't of Pub. Works
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 6 Noviembre 2012
    ...Krevis v. Bridgeport, 262 Conn. 813, 823, 817 A.2d 628, on remand, 80 Conn.App. 432, 835 A.2d 123 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 914, 841 A.2d 219 (2004). The record in the present case plainly indicates that Daigle, at the time that he prepared the field reports at issue, lacked knowledge......
  • United Hudson Bank v. PNC Bank New England, No. CV 03-0193878 S (CT 1/18/2006)
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 18 Enero 2006
    ...aff'd, 263 Conn. 22, 818 A.2d 37 (2003); Krevis v. Bridgeport, 80 Conn.App. 432, 435, 835 A.2d 123 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 914, 841 A.2d 219 (2004). In addition, the defendant was well aware of the potential application of the UCC having argued, in its initial brief, that the plaint......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT