Krueger v. Wilde, 1
| Decision Date | 27 May 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. 1,1 |
| Citation | 614 N.Y.S.2d 88,204 A.D.2d 988 |
| Parties | Marjorie KRUEGER, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Melanie Krueger, Respondent, v. Nancy WILDE and Ralph T. Wilde, Appellants. Appeal |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Saperston and Day, P.C. by John Freedenberg, Buffalo, for appellants, Nancy and Ralph Wilde.
Paul William Beltz, P.C. by Francis Letro, Buffalo, for respondent.
Before DENMAN, P.J., and LAWTON, DOERR and DAVIS, JJ.
In this wrongful death action, the jury apportioned fault 65% to decedent and 35% to defendants. Supreme Court set aside the jury's apportionment of fault and granted plaintiff's motion for a new trial unless defendants stipulated to accept Supreme Court's apportionment of fault 100% to them. That was error. We cannot conclude that "there is simply no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational [persons] to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence presented at trial" (Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 499, 410 N.Y.S.2d 282, 382 N.E.2d 1145; see, Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 495 N.Y.S.2d 184). Even if the jury disregarded defendants' version of the accident and fully credited plaintiff's version, there is sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of plaintiff's decedent to raise a triable issue concerning the relative degrees of fault (see, Nitzke v. Loveland, 188 A.D.2d 1058, 1059, 592 N.Y.S.2d 165). Nor should Supreme Court have set aside the jury's apportionment of fault as being against the weight of the evidence. The discretionary power to set aside a verdict as not supported by the weight of the evidence should be exercised with "considerable caution" (Nicastro v. Park, supra, 113 A.D.2d at 133, 495 N.Y.S.2d 184). We conclude that a fair interpretation of the evidence supports the jury's determination and Supreme Court's contrary finding indicates an impermissible interference with the jury's resolution of credibility issues (Nitzke v. Loveland, supra; Nicastro v. Park, supra, 113 A.D.2d at 133-135, 495 N.Y.S.2d 184). Consequently, Supreme Court's apportionment of fault is vacated and the verdict reinstated in that respect.
Supreme Court properly set aside the jury's determination that plaintiff suffered no pecuniary loss by the death of her 14-year-old daughter. The proof submitted demonstrated that plaintiff's daughter had completed eighth grade with an 85 average, had an I.Q. of 125, was a good...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Saint v. U.S.
...may also support a different version (see, Coutrier v. Haraden Motorcar Corp., 237 A.D.2d 774, 775, 655 N.Y.S.2d 660; Krueger v. Wilde, 204 A.D.2d 988, 989, 614 N.Y.S.2d 88; Esner v. Janisziewski, 180 A.D.2d 991, 993, 580 N.Y.S.2d 551; Vail v. Keeler, 166 A.D.2d 817, 819, 562 N.Y.S.2d In La......
-
Braun v. Cesareo
...(see generally Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 498–499, 410 N.Y.S.2d 282, 382 N.E.2d 1145 [1978] ; Krueger v. Wilde, 204 A.D.2d 988, 989, 614 N.Y.S.2d 88 [4th Dept. 1994] ). I conclude, however, that the amount of damages awarded for past and future pain and suffering deviated mater......
-
Teller v. Anzano
...may also support a different version (see, Coutrier v. Haraden Motorcar Corp., 237 A.D.2d 774, 775, 655 N.Y.S.2d 660; Krueger v. Wilde, 204 A.D.2d 988, 989, 614 N.Y.S.2d 88; Esner v. Janisziewski, 180 A.D.2d 991, 993, 580 N.Y.S.2d 551; Vail v. Keeler, 166 A.D.2d 817, 819, 562 N.Y.S.2d 818).......
-
Severino v. Schuyler Meadows Club Inc.
...evidence presented at trial" (Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 499, 410 N.Y.S.2d 282, 382 N.E.2d 1145; see, Krueger v. Wilde, 204 A.D.2d 988, 989, 614 N.Y.S.2d 88). There was ample testimony from which the jury could find that Brownell was 80% liable for the injuries. Brownell was pr......