Kruger v. Page Management Co., Inc.
Decision Date | 25 July 1980 |
Citation | 432 N.Y.S.2d 295,105 Misc.2d 14 |
Parties | Stephen KRUGER, Plaintiff, v. PAGE MANAGEMENT CO., INC., 25th Realty Associates and Theodore Bye, Defendants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court |
Stephen Kruger, New York City, pro se.
Melvin Charles Cohen, New York City, for defendants.
Sublease or release? Ratification or reasonable refusal? A legislative intentional dilemma or determination?
Does Real Property Law § 226-b, as amended (Right to sublease or assign), after tenant's requisite notice of intent to sublease and landlord's arbitrary rejection, give a residential tenant the right to sublease or a release from the lease?
This is an action by a residential tenant ("tenant") for a declaratory judgment, pursuant to CPLR-3001 & 3017(b), an injunction to compel defendants defendants, owner and managing agents ("landlord"), to consent to a proposed sublease and consequential damages. The basis of tenant's action is landlord's unreasonable withholding of consent, as supported by prior New York caselaw, and as a matter of right under Real Property Law ("RPL") § 226-b, as amended, as logically and equitably interpreted.
In opposition, landlord seeks to dismiss tenant's action upon the merits and with costs and set this matter down for an inquest to determine reasonable attorney's fees, under paragraphs and '22.' of the lease (See, complaint X # '1.' & affidavit in opposition X # 'A.'). Landlord, assuming without conceding tenant's allegations, submits that both prior caselaw, under RPL § 226-b, as amended, its clear and proper interpretation and legislative intent as expressed by its New York State Assembly sponsor, mandate the dismissal of tenant's action and granting of landlord's relief.
This action was commenced by Order To Show Cause, dated May 19, 1980, together with a supporting affirmation, summons and complaint, all dated May 19, 1980 and served upon defendants & attorney on May 20 & 21, 1980, respectively. Thereafter, on May 27, 1980, issue was joined by service of defendants' affidavit in opposition upon plaintiff.
The facts are undisputed, as follows. Tenant, an attorney appearing pro se, and landlord, on July 30, 1979, duly entered into a Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. standard form of apartment lease (1978) for rent-stabilized apartment 2RW, premises no. 210 East 25th Street, New York, N.Y., which contains over four (4) residential units. Said lease was for a three (3) year term, effective November 1, 1979 and October 31, 1982, at a monthly base rental of $178.25, with a one (1) security deposit.
Pertinent paragraph of said lease provides:
(Underlining added)
Paragraphs '20.' (Remedies of Owner) and '22.' (Fees and Expenses) provide for tenant's responsibility recovery of attorney's fees Owner has paid in bringing any legal action or dispossess proceedings for tenant's violation of said lease.
Paragraph '31.' (rider) also provides:
(underlining added)
Thereafter, on May 6, 1980, tenant, by certified mail, return receipt requested, notified landlord's managing agent, Page Management Co., Inc., by Theodore Bye, of his intent to sublease subject apartment, beginning July 1, 1980, to Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Schnide, proposed sublessees, and included their current respective home and business addresses. (see tenant's X# 1.) It does not appear that the proposed sublessees are members of tenant's immediate family. Mr. Schnide is evidently a medical student, intern or resident at New York Medical College while Mrs. Schnide is an elementary school teacher, both currently living together in High Falls, New York.
Thereafter, on May 15, 1980, landlord, by its managing agent, advised tenant, by mail, that (see tenant's X # 2; complaint X # 3). Thereafter, on May 20, 1980, tenant commenced this action.
(1) Real Property Law § 226-b. Right to sublease or assign.
3.
L.1975, ch. 146, eff. June 3, 1975, L.1975, ch. 548, eff. July 29, 1975 and L.1976, ch. 198, eff. May 25, 1976, which added all provisions relating to the right to assign residential leases & is not applicable herein.
(2) Real Property Law § 226-b, as originally enacted, under L.1975, ch. 146, eff. June 3, 1975, provided:
(3) Rent Stabilization Law of 1969, as amended ("RSL"), N.Y.C.Admin.Code, ch. 51, §§ YY51-1.0 et seq.
There appear to be no directly applicable RSL provisions, including its Rent Stabilization Code promulgated thereunder. Recently, however, an informational RSL apartment lease Rider, effective May 6, 1980, was approved under RSL § 6.0(d), to be discussed below.
A sublease was originally defined as a grant by tenant of an interest in demised premises less than his (her or its) own, retaining a reversion. Collins v. Hasbrouck, 56 N.Y. 157, 162 (1874). At common law in New York, the general rule is that, in the absence of an express restriction, by contract or statute, a tenant for a definite term has an unrestricted right to assign or sublet at will, Eten v. Luyster, 60 N.Y. 252 (1875); Fleish v. Schnaier, 119 App.Div. 815, 104 N.Y.S. 921 (1st Dep't-1907); with restrictions thereon viewed with disfavor by the Courts. Francis v. Ferguson, 246 N.Y. 516, 519, 159 N.E. 416 (1927); American Book Co. v. Yeshiva University Dev. Foundation, Inc., 59 Misc.2d 31, 33, 297 N.Y.S.2d 156 (Supr.Ct.-N.Y.Co.-1969). Furthermore,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Randolph v. Koury Corp.
...109 (1962); Todd v. Board of Educational Lands and Funds of Neb., 154 Neb. 606, 48 N.W.2d 706 (1951); Kruger v. Page Management Co., Inc., 105 Misc.2d 14, 432 N.Y.S.2d 295 (1980); Gripentrog v. City of Wahpeton, 126 N.W.2d 230 (N.D.1964); Powerine Co. v. Russell's, Inc., 103 Utah 441, 135 P......
-
Funk v. Funk
...Colo.App. 446, 540 P.2d 1149, 1151 (1975); Robinson v. Weitz, 171 Conn. 545, 370 A.2d 1066, 1068 (1976); Kruger v. Page Management Co., 105 Misc.2d 14, 432 N.Y.S.2d 295, 300 (1980) (recognizing rule absent applicability of statute governing residential leases); Herlou Card Shop, Inc. v. Pru......
-
In re Kong
...213, 468 N.E.2d 51 (1984); Fleisch v. Schnaier, 119 A.D. 815, 815, 104 N.Y.S. 921, 921 (1st Dep't 1907); Kruger v. Page Mgt. Co., 105 Misc.2d 14, 19, 432 N.Y.S.2d 295, 299 (Sup.Ct. Special Term N.Y. County 1980); American Book Co. v. Yeshiva Univ. Dev. Found, Inc., 59 Misc.2d 31, 33, 297 N.......
-
People v. Korkala
...showing that other legislators were aware of its scope. (Matter of Delmar Box Co. [Aetna Ins. Co.], 309 NY 60, 67 )." (Krugar v. Page, 105 Misc.2d 14, 25, 432 N.Y.S.2d 295.) An analysis of the Shield Law cannot, therefore, rest exclusively on this memorandum. Rather, the process of statutor......
-
Navigating Commercial Lease Assignment Provisions: Tenants Beware
...prove not only problematic, but in certain circumstances, a commercial and legal disaster. Footnotes 1 SeeKruger v. Page Management Co., 105 Misc. 2d 14 (N.Y. 2 SeeRubenstein Bros. v. Ole of 34th Street, Inc., 101 Misc. 2d 563 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 1979), citing: Ser-Bye Corp. v. C.P. & G. Mar......
-
27.10 A. Whether Required
...Rosner, 14 A.D.2d 272, 220 N.Y.S.2d 288 (1st Dep’t 1961), aff’d, 12 N.Y.2d 693, 233 N.Y.S.2d 477 (1962); Kruger v. Page Mgmt. Co., Inc., 105 Misc. 2d 14, 432 N.Y.S.2d 295 (Sup. Ct., N.Y. Co. 1980) (including subletting in the majority rule).[694] . See Durand v. Lipman, 165 Misc. 615, 621–2......