Kucera v. Kucera, 75--1005
| Decision Date | 26 March 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 75--1005,75--1005 |
| Citation | 330 So.2d 38 |
| Parties | Frank E. KUCERA, Appellant, v. Jane H. KUCERA, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Edna L. Caruso, Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D'Aiuto & Dean, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Philip J. Gouze, Law Offices of James P. O'Flarity, Palm Beach, for appellee.
Upon due consideration of the briefs and the circumstances reflected in the record on appeal we are of the opinion that the trial court erred in entering its order disbursing attorney's fees to the appellant-husband's additional counsel.
Appellant had previously deposited certain monies with his original counsel of record during the pendency of dissolution proceedings. As it appeared that original counsel was to be called as a witness at the final hearing appellant found it necessary to secure additional counsel. Subsequently, additional counsel filed a motion for relief of counsel and attorney's fees. Pursuant thereto the trial court entered an order adjudicating the amount of the attorney's fees and directing that such fees be paid from funds held by appellant's original counsel.
According to the established case law in Florida, absent a claim of a charging lien a lawyer's disputed claim for fees must be prosecuted in a separate action at law. Cristiani v. Cristiani, 114 So.2d 726 (Fla.App.2d 1959); Chaachou v. Chaachou, 122 So.2d 24 (Fla.App.3d 1960); Worley v. Phillips, 264 So.2d 42 (Fla.App.2d 1972); Weksler v. Stamatinos, 314 So.2d 616 (Fla.App.3d 1975); see also 3 Fla.Jur., Attorneys at Law, § 69, et seq. Moreover, even where a charging lien is involved, in the absence of statute or contract providing otherwise, the lien attaches to the proceeds of a judgment or settlement or to any funds recovered by an attorney for his client so that disbursement is contingent upon such circumstances. 3 Fla.Jur., supra, §§ 76, 77.
Accordingly, the order disbursing attorney's fees is vacated and set aside and the cause remanded for such other proceedings as are consistent herewith.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Litman v. Fine, Jacobson, Schwartz, Nash, Block & England, P.A.
...matter, attach. See Pasin v. Kroo, 412 So.2d 43 (lien may issue only if attorney has in fact recovered proceeds); Kucera v. Kucera, 330 So.2d 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) (noting that money deposited by client with his attorney during pendency of dissolution action would not be proper subject of ......
-
Freedman v. Horton, Schwartz & Perse
...affirm. See: In Re Barker's Estate, 75 So.2d 303 (Fla.1954); Westerman v. Shell's City, Inc., 265 So.2d 43 (Fla.1972); Kucera v. Kucera, 330 So.2d 38 (Fla.4th DCA 1976); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Cruz v. Brown, 338 So.2d 245 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); Klarish v. Cypen, 343 So.2d 1288 (......
-
Richman Greer Weil Brumbaugh v. Chernak
...fruits of the attorney's service, we find that the trial court erred as a matter of law in disbursing the funds." In Kucera v. Kucera, 330 So.2d 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), this court denied the imposition of a charging lien held in an attorney's trust account, not because the trial court did n......
-
Scutieri v. Estate of Revitz
...by an attorney for his client." 4 Florida Jurisdiction 2d § 161 (citing Randall v. Archer 5 Fla. 438 (1854) and Kucera v. Kucera 330 So.2d 38 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1976)) (emphasis added). In the absence of statutory authority or an express contractual provision, an attorney's charging lien may ......