Kuhn v. City of Yoakum
Decision Date | 08 November 1923 |
Docket Number | (No. 8394.) |
Citation | 257 S.W. 337 |
Parties | KUHN et al. v. CITY OF YOAKUM et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, De Witt County; John M. Green, Judge.
Suit by W. A. Kuhn and others against the City of Yoakum and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
Bailey & Wallace, of Cuero, for appellants.
Carothers & Brown, of Houston, and Durell Miller, of Yoakum, for appellees.
W. A. Kuhn and others, who are appellants here, filed in the district court of De Witt county their petition complaining of the city of Yoakum, its assessor and collector of taxes, and the Yoakum independent school district, who are appellees in this court, attacking an extension of the limits of the city of Yoakum for school purposes only, made pursuant to article 2883 of our Revised Statutes, at the same time seeking to permanently enjoin the appellees from enforcing ordinances of the city whereby the limits were so extended, and from levying, assessing, or collecting any taxes for school purposes on the lands taken in by such extension for school purposes only, the property of the petitioners being within the territory so added, but not in the independent school district as theretofore existing; the petition also assailed an ordinance of the city levying a 60-cent tax on the $100 valuation on all property within the limits of the city as so extended, as well as the election by which the tax was authorized.
Substantially the petition charged that prior to 1915 the city of Yoakum was incorporated under the general laws of this state, and had taken charge of the public free schools within its limits; that in 1915, under what is known as the Home Rule Amendment to the Constitution, it adopted a charter as a city of more than 5,000 inhabitants, still retaining the same control of the public free schools within its limits; that by ordinances dated May 2, 1922, and June 10, 1922, the city undertook to make the above-mentioned extension of its lines for school purposes only, taking in the lands owned by the appellants; that by ordinance dated July 22, 1922, and pursuant to R. S. art. 2876, it undertook to levy the tax of 60 cents on the $100 valuation on the lands in the city limits as so extended for school purposes only, after the property tax paying voters residing within the limits as so extended had voted in favor of such tax at an election held for that purpose on July 11, 1922.
A temporary injunction to the same purport as that finally contemplated by the pleaders was also sought and from the refusal of the district judge to grant that relief, after a hearing upon the matter, this appeal is prosecuted.
Appellants do not question the fact that the ordinances effecting the extension they complain of were enacted in response to a petition not only signed by more than a majority of the resident qualified voters of the territory thereby taken into the city for school purposes only, but also recommended by a majority vote of the trustees of the public free schools of the city, as R. S. art. 2883, provides, but by written and oral arguments in this court they attack the extension and tax levy mainly on the following grounds:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Manges v. Freer Independent School Dist.
...91 (Tex.Comm.App.1928, opinion adopted), contains language seemingly contrary to our holding, the case is distinguishable on its facts. In the Kuhn case the court held that a petition for extension of boundaries was sufficient to burden the residents of the added territory with the district......
-
City of Van Alstyne v. State ex rel. Bd. of Trustees of Anna Independent School Dist.
...415; Hayes v. City of Beaumont, Tex.Civ.App., 190 S.W.2d 835; City of Houston v. Little, Tex.Civ.App., 244 S.W. 247; Kuhn v. City of Yoakum, Tex.Civ.App., 257 S.W. 337; Kuhn v. City of Yoakum, Tex.Com.App., 6 S.W.2d But in the case at bar, appellant is an independent school district; the is......
-
Kuhn v. City of Yoakum
...330, 37 Am. Rep. 758; El Paso v. Ruckman, 92 Tex. 86, 46 S. W. 25; Graham v. Greenville, 67 Tex. 62, 2 S. W. 742; Kuhn v. City of Yoakum (Tex. Civ. App.) 257 S. W. 337; City of Houston v. Little (Tex. Civ. App.) 244 S. W. 255; Ex parte Koen, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 279, 125 S. W. 401; State v. Dunso......
-
Kuhn v. City of Yoakum
...changed by these new allegations, the questions the cause presents were all ruled adversely to appellants before. See Kuhn v. City of Yoakum (Tex. Civ. App.) 257 S. W. 337. We have not only considered the present appeal in the light of this fresh attack upon the validity of the petition for......