Kunstoplast of America, Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., USA
| Decision Date | 13 December 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. 96-0757,96-0757 |
| Citation | 937 S.W.2d 455 |
| Parties | 40 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 196 KUNSTOPLAST OF AMERICA, INC. and Ashok K. Chauhan, Petitioners, v. FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, USA, Respondent. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Matthew L. Benson, Roger R. Evans, Houston, for Petitioners.
Mark F. Elvig, Scott J. Davenport, Houston, for Respondent.
We decide whether a corporate officer, who is not a licensed attorney, may nevertheless perfect an appeal by filing cash deposits in lieu of cost bonds on behalf of the corporation and an individual. The court of appeals held that he could not, and dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 928 S.W.2d 582. We reverse that judgment and remand the case to the court of appeals for consideration on the merits.
On November 30, 1995, Formosa Plastics Corp., U.S.A., obtained a judgment against Kunstoplast of America, Inc., and Ashok K. Chauhan. To perfect an appeal for both parties, Justin Seth, an officer of Kunstoplast, filed cash deposits in lieu of cost bonds on behalf of both Kunstoplast and Chauhan. See TEX.R.APP. P. 46(b), 48.
The court of appeals dismissed Kunstoplast's appeal, holding that only a licensed attorney can represent a corporation. 928 S.W.2d at 582. The court also dismissed Chauhan's appeal because he did not represent himself or appear by a licensed attorney as required by Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 7. Id. at 583. We reject the court of appeals' holding on both counts.
Both Kunstoplast and Chauhan made bona fide attempts to invoke the court of appeals' jurisdiction by having Seth file their cash deposits in lieu of cost bonds. See Grand Prairie Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Southern Parts Imports, Inc., 813 S.W.2d 499, 500 (Tex.1991); Woods Exploration & Producing Co. v. Arkla Equip. Co., 528 S.W.2d 568, 570 (Tex.1975). "It is our policy to construe rules reasonably but liberally, when possible, so that the right to appeal is not lost by creating a requirement not absolutely necessary from the literal words of the rule." Jamar v. Patterson, 868 S.W.2d 318, 319 (Tex.1993). Generally a corporation may be represented only by a licensed attorney, see Moore v. Elektro-Mobil Technik GmbH, 874 S.W.2d 324, 327 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1994, writ denied), and an individual must appear in person or by an attorney. See TEX.R. CIV. P. 7. We hold, however, that Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 40(a)(1) and 41(a)(1) do not preclude a nonlawyer from performing the specific...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
King Fisher Marine Serv., L.P. v. Tamez
...of Appellate Procedure 38.1(h) to preserve an appellant's right to appeal despite a procedural error); Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex.1996) (liberally interpreting Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(a)(1) to preserve an appellant's right to appeal).......
-
Delgado v. Texas Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund, No. 03-03-00621-CV (TX 3/17/2006)
...3. Miguel told the court that he had just learned that morning that he could not represent BMS.See Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996) (generally, corporation may only be represented by licensed 4. The motion was timely filed because July 26 w......
-
City of Houston Fire Fighters' v. Morris
...is not lost by creating a requirement not absolutely necessary from the literal words of the rule. Kunstoplast of America, Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex.1996).8 See TEX.REV.CIV. STAT. ANN. Art. 1269m (repealed 1987).9 The City contends that if the Legislature had ......
-
Corona v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp., 06-07-00015-CV.
...held that a nonattorney may not appear pro se on behalf of a corporation. See, e.g., Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., USA, 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex.1996) (per curiam); Moore By and Through Moore v. Elektro-Mobil Technik GmbH, 874 S.W.2d 324, 327 (Tex. App.-El Paso 1994, w......
-
Business Litigation
...the clerk in lieu of a cost bond in order to perfect appeal in justice court. [ Kunstoplast of America, Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp. , 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996).] §4:81 Failure to Pay Franchise Taxes A foreign or domestic corporation that has not paid its corporate franchise taxes f......