Kuperberg v. Montalbano

Citation899 N.Y.S.2d 344,72 A.D.3d 903
PartiesMaureen KUPERBERG, respondent, v. Joan MONTALBANO, appellant.
Decision Date20 April 2010
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Eisenberg & Kirsch, Liberty, N.Y. (Michael D. Wolff of counsel), for appellant.

Wingate, Russotti & Shapiro, LLP, New York, N.Y. (David M. Schwarz of counsel), for respondent.

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, and PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), entered August 14, 2009, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and denied her cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted, and the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied as academic.

On November 12, 2007, a motor vehicle being operated by the defendant made contact with the plaintiff, a pedestrian, in the parking lot of a shopping center in Bayshore. After receiving treatment at the emergency room of Franklin Hospital later on the day of the occurrence, the plaintiff did not receive any additionaltreatment for her alleged injuries, until January 22, 2008, 71 days later, when she was treated by Timothy Reish, an orthopedist. On or about April 2008, the plaintiff commenced the present action, alleging that, as a result of the contact with the defendant's motor vehicle, she sustained a torn rotator cuff in her right shoulder.

After joinder of issue, the plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and the defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d). The defendant met her prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident ( see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 N.Y.2d 345, 746 N.Y.S.2d 865, 774 N.E.2d 1197; Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 956-957, 582 N.Y.S.2d 990, 591 N.E.2d 1176; Rivera v. Bushwick Ridgewood Props., Inc., 63 A.D.3d 712, 880 N.Y.S.2d 149). The defendant's evidence, which included, inter alia, an X-ray report prepared in the emergency room on the day of the occurrence and a magnetic resonance imaging (hereinafter MRI) report prepared by the plaintiff's own radiologist with regard to an MRI of the plaintiff's right shoulder...

To continue reading

Request your trial
70 cases
  • Collymore-Maynard v. Gayle-Lyken
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 13, 2023
    ...for summary judgment. See Master v. Boiakhtchion, 122 A.D.3d 589, 590, 996 N.Y.S.2d 116, 117 [2d Dept 2014]; Kuperberg v. Montalbano, 72 A.D.3d 903, 904, 899 N.Y.S.2d 344, 345 [2d Dept 2010]; Camacho v. Dwelle, 54 A.D.3d 706, 863 N.Y.S.2d 754 [2d Dept 2008], In this case, the Verified Bill ......
  • Amirova v. JND Trans Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 6, 2019
    ...support of its motion. See Master v. Boiakhtchion, 122 A.D.3d 589, 590, 996 N.Y.S.2d 116,117 [2nd Dept, 2014]; Kuperberg v. Montalbano, 72 A.D.3d 903, 904, 899 N.Y.S.2d 344, 345 [2ndDept, 2010]; Camacho v. Dwelle, 54 A.D.3d 706, 863 N.Y.S.2d 754 [2nd Dept, 2008]. In this case the movant poi......
  • Lapaix v. Consiglio, Index No. 8839/09
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • October 4, 2011
    ...customary daily activities for not less than 90 days during the 180 days immediately following the occurrence (Kuperberg v. Montalbano, 72 A.D.3d 903, 899 N.Y.S.2d 344 (2d Dept., 2010); Sanchez v. Williamsburg Volunteer of Hatzolah, Inc., 48 A.D.3d 664, 852 N.Y.S.2d 287 [2d Dept., 2008]). T......
  • Meza v. Green Leasing Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • May 9, 2023
    ...is not the case here. See Master v. Boiakhtchion, 122 A.D.3d 589, 590, 996 N.Y.S.2d 116, 117 [2d Dept 2014]; Kuperberg v. Montalbano, 6 72 A.D.3d 903, 904, 899 N.Y.S.2d 344, 345 [2d Dept 2010]; Camacho v. Dwelle, 54 A.D.3d 706, 863 N.Y.S.2d 754 [2d Dept 2008], Turning to the merits of Defen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT