Kurth v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co.

Decision Date13 February 1935
Docket NumberNo. 9521.,9521.
Citation79 S.W.2d 338
PartiesKURTH et al. v. NATIONAL LIFE & ACCIDENT INS. CO., Inc.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; Harry L. Howard, Judge.

Suit by Clara Kurth (feme sole) and others against the National Life & Accident Insurance Company, Incorporated. From an adverse judgment, plaintiffs appeal.

Affirmed.

Carter & Carter, of San Antonio, for appellants.

G. Woodson Morris, of San Antonio, for appellee.

BICKETT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by Clara Kurth, individually and as next friend of Herbert Kurth and John Kurth, minors, and Eagle Furniture Stores, Inc., from a judgment of the district court denying to them any recovery, except the sum of $445 paid into the registry of the court, against the National Life & Accident Insurance Company, upon a policy of life insurance issued by it in the principal sum of $5,000 upon the life of John Henry Kurth, deceased.

The soundness of the defense, that the policy lapsed by reason of the nonpayment of the fourth annual premium within the grace period of thirty-one days after its due date, depends primarily upon whether the premium was due annually upon the day of the month specified in the policy or upon the anniversary of the date of the original delivery of the policy.

The policy was executed on December 14, 1928, payable to Eagle Furniture Stores, Inc., the employer of the assured. There was also an express assignment of the policy by the assured to Eagle Furniture Stores, Inc. The policy showed on the outside in conspicuous words and figures: "Annual Premium $125.35 Due December 10th." The policy contained the following provisions:

"This Insurance is granted in consideration of the application herefor, a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part of this contract, and of the payment of premiums as follows: The First Premium of One Hundred Twenty-Five 35/100 Dollars on delivery of this policy, and

"Further Premiums of like amount due on the 10th day of December 1929 and every Twelve calendar months thereafter, during the life of the Insured.

"After delivery of this policy to the Insured during his lifetime and good health it becomes effective as of the 10th day of December 1928, which is the date of issue and the beginning of the first policy year hereunder. * * *

"A grace of thirty-one days, without interest charge, will be allowed for the payment of any premium after the first, during which time the insurance shall continue in force. If the Insured die within said period, the unpaid premium shall be deducted from the amount payable under this policy. * * *

"This Policy shall not take effect until the first premium hereon shall have been actually paid and the Policy actually delivered to the Insured during the lifetime and good health of the Insured."

The application, as well as the policy, showed that the policy was issued upon the age of the assured as forty-one years. The application, dated November 9, 1928, stated the date of his birth as June 11, 1887, and his age to nearest birthday as forty-one years. The policy on the front and cover pages showed his age as forty-one years and the premium as the amount mentioned, which was the premium for an assured of that age. And the policy contained a typewritten table of figures for cash or loan values and for paid-up insurance upon the basis of the assured's age being forty-one years.

The application contained the following provision: "I hereby agree on my own behalf and on behalf of any person who may have or claim any interest in my policy, issued pursuant to this proposal: (1) That the proposed contract shall not be effective until the policy has been issued, the first premium actually paid to and accepted by the Company or its authorized agent, and the policy has been delivered to and accepted by me, all during my lifetime and while I am in good health."

The jury found that the date of delivery of the policy to the assured was December 26, 1928, basing its answer to this one of the two issues submitted upon the evidence to the effect that the policy was delivered some time between Christmas Day and the end of the year.

The December, 1931, premium was not paid or tendered by any one within thirty-one days after December 10, 1931; nor was the policy thereafter reinstated. On January 20, 1932, Eagle Furniture Stores, Inc., mailed its check of that date for the amount of the premium to the insurance company. The insurance company, however, did not cash the check, but returned it to the sender with a letter dated February 12, 1932, explaining that the check was dated nine days after expiration of the grace period and that the reinstatement of the policy was declined. On February 13, 1932, the Eagle Furniture Stores, Inc., in response to that letter, made further inquiry as to whether the policy could be reinstated. The reply of the insurance company, dated February 17, 1932, was as follows: "Our records show this policy lapsed for nonpayment of premium due December 10, 1931. Application for reinstatement was sent us and after due consideration by our risk committee was declined. We will be glad to consider another application for reinstatement in this case after the lapse of a reasonable length of time, however, and, if possible to do so, will gladly restore the policy." No action was thereafter taken by any one with reference to reinstatement of the policy.

The assured died January 5, 1933.

The policy also contained the following provision: "After...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Holbrook v. Southland Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 25 May 1939
    ...legion, only citations thereof rather than extended discussion of them will be made. Among the Texas cases are these: Kurth v. National Life, Tex.Civ.App., 79 S.W.2d 338, writ refused; Rolerson v. Standard Life, Tex.Civ.App., 244 S.W. 845; Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. Myers, Tex.Com.......
  • Life Ins. Co. of Southwest v. Overstreet
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • 25 June 1980
    ...660 (1949); Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. Peddy, 139 Tex. 245, 162 S.W.2d 652 (1942); Kurth v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co., Inc., 79 S.W.2d 338 (Tex.Civ.App. San Antonio 1935, writ ref'd); 1 Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice § 105 (1965). This court's decision in Peddy, supra, re......
  • Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. Peddy
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • 6 May 1942
    ...are due and payable, such date will control, irrespective of the date on which the policy is delivered. Kurth v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co., Inc., Tex.Civ.App., 79 S.W.2d 338, writ refused; Rolerson v. Standard Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 244 S.W. 845; Prange v. International Life I......
  • Johnson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • 20 July 1938
    ... ... Life Insurance Co. v. McMillen, 24 Ohio St. 67; ... Kurth v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co., ... Tex.Civ.App., 79 S.W.2d 338), and if it does not, then ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT