Kuykendall v. City of New York

Decision Date20 July 1943
Citation291 N.Y. 547,50 N.E.2d 655
PartiesJames KUYKENDALL, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, 265 App.Div. 1051, 40 N.Y.S.2d 536.

Action by James Kuykendall against the City of New York to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff. The plaintiff while waiting for an elevated train operated by defendant about 10:00 P. M. was jostled by two drunken men so that plaintiff lost his balance and fell to the tracks in front of an oncoming train, which cut off his arm. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff failed to prove such conduct on part of the drunken men on the platform as would create a duty on the ticket agent's part to foresee that they were likely to injure the plaintiff, and to exclude them from the premises as a precautionary measure. The plaintiff contended that the question of defendant's negligence was for the jury.

From a judgment of the Appellate Division, 265 App.Div. 1051, 40 N.Y.S.2d 536, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $38,146.70 defendant appeals.

Affirmed.Thomas D. Thacher, of New York City (Paxton Blair and Joseph F. Mulqueen, Jr., both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Louis H. Levine and Abraham L. Kanter, both of New York City (Ralph Stout, of New York City, and Robert McGowan Smith, of Brooklyn, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed with costs.

All concur except LEHMAN, C. J. who dissents and THACHER, J., taking no part.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • People v. Bonino
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • July 20, 1943
  • Callaghan v. City of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • May 14, 1953
    ...one of simple overcrowding, unattended by disorderliness or gang action. Cases like Feldman v. Murray (285 N.Y. 568) and Kuykendall v. City of New York (291 N.Y. 547) are distinguishable. Since I am unable to find any measure, within the limits of practicality, which the defendant might hav......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT