Kweh v. Edmunds

Decision Date16 March 2012
Citation2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 01997,93 A.D.3d 1247,940 N.Y.S.2d 436
PartiesOphelia KWEH, as Guardian of the Person and Property of John Kweh, and Ophelia Kweh, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Christopher C. EDMUNDS, Patrick D. Sampson, Skinner Sales, Inc., Defendants–Appellants, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 1.).Ophelia Kweh, as Administratrix of The Estate of Sampson Kweh, Deceased, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Christopher C. Edmunds, Patrick D. Sampson, Skinner Sales, Inc., Defendants–Appellants, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.).Philip Kweh, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Christopher C. Edmunds, Patrick D. Sampson, Skinner Sales, Inc., Defendants–Appellants, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 3.).Kadra Dayow, as Administratrix of The Estate of Mohamed Dayow, Deceased, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Ophelia Kweh, as Administratrix of The Estate of Juty Kweh, Deceased, Defendant,Patrick D. Sampson And Christopher C. Edmunds, Defendants–Appellants. (Action No. 4.)Kadra Dayow, as Administratrix of The Estate of Mohamed Dayow, Deceased, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Skinner Sales, Inc., Defendant–Appellant. (Action No. 5.).
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Costello, Cooney & Fearon, PLLC, Syracuse (Donald S. Dibenedetto of Counsel), for DefendantsAppellants.

Brindisi, Murad, Brindisi, Pearlman, Julian & Pertz, LLP, Utica (Richard Pertz of Counsel), The Golden Law Firm, and Peter M. Hobaica LLC, for PlaintiffsRespondents.

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Plaintiffs commenced these negligence and wrongful death actions stemming from a motor vehicle accident that occurred when a vehicle operated by decedent Juty Kweh (Kweh) collided with a vehicle operated by defendant Christopher C. Edmunds. The collision occurred when Edmunds and Kweh were driving in opposite directions on a two-lane highway, and the vehicle driven by Kweh entered Edmunds's lane of travel. Supreme Court properly denied the motion of Edmunds, defendant Patrick D. Sampson, and defendant Skinner Sales, Inc. (hereafter, defendants) for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the complaints and all cross claims against them. In order to establish their entitlement to summary judgment based on the emergency doctrine in this crossover case, defendants were required to establish “both that [Kweh's] vehicle ‘suddenly entered the lane where [Edmunds] was operating [his vehicle] in a lawful and prudent manner and that there was nothing [Edmunds] could have done to avoid the collision’ ( Fratangelo v. Benson, 294 A.D.2d 880, 881, 741 N.Y.S.2d 798, quoting Pilarski v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 269 A.D.2d 821, 822, 702 N.Y.S.2d 485; see Rost v. Stolzman, 81 A.D.3d 1401, 1402, 917 N.Y.S.2d 470). Defendants failed to meet that burden inasmuch as the proof submitted by them in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Hill v. Thomas P. Cash
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 mai 2014
    ...there was nothing Hill could have done to avoid the collision ( see Shanahan, 111 A.D.3d at 1329, 974 N.Y.S.2d 710;Kweh v. Edmunds, 93 A.D.3d 1247, 1248, 940 N.Y.S.2d 436;Wasson v. Szafarski, 6 A.D.3d 1182, 1183, 776 N.Y.S.2d 423). The record establishes that, on the dry and sunny day in qu......
  • City of Oswego v. Oswego City Firefighters Ass'n
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 16 mars 2012
  • Shanahan v. Mackowiak
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 8 novembre 2013
    ...in a lawful and prudent manner, and defendant had little time to react to avoid the collision ( see generally Kweh v. Edmunds, 93 A.D.3d 1247, 1248, 940 N.Y.S.2d 436;Clough v. Szymanski, 26 A.D.3d 894, 895, 809 N.Y.S.2d 707;Pilarski v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 269 A.D.2d 821, 822, 702 N.Y.S......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT