Lackland v. Hadley
Decision Date | 02 July 1914 |
Docket Number | No. 15298.,15298. |
Citation | 169 S.W. 275,260 Mo. 539 |
Parties | LACKLAND et al. v. HADLEY, Atty. Gen., et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
DEEDS (§ 168) — CONDITIONS — REMEDY FOR BREACH.
S. conveyed to the city of St. Louis a tract of land, containing conditions, among others, that all the tract shall be used as a public park, except the outer rim thereof, of a width of 200 feet, designated on the plat for leasing "on long leases for villa residences, which should be an ornament to the park, and source of revenue," and that the city shall, from time to time, lease said strip, in lots of designated size, for periods of 30 years before renewal, for villa residences, and pay over the rents to S. and his assigns, and providing for the property reverting if any of the conditions be violated; a subsequent deed of S. provided that nonperformance by the city of the conditions as to such strip shall not work a forfeiture as to the rest of the land, but expressly reserved to himself and assigns right, on any willful violation by the city of the condition as to leasing and paying the rents, to enforce performance thereof. Held, that while such strip, the fee to which is vested in the city, was intended to be an ornament to the park, the city has the duty of attempting, in good faith, to rent it, and of renting it, if it can get any substantial rent, for ornamental villa residences, and, when rented, of paying over the rents, and that there is reserved a right at least to enforce this duty, where there has been a willful neglect thereof, but there can be no relief, under a petition in equity by the assignees under the will of S. not only not alleging willful neglect, but proceeding on the theory that the property cannot be so rented, and praying for its sale and payment of the proceeds to them, whether the provision as to renting be a condition subsequent, or a mere covenant or agreement of the grantee.
In Banc. Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; Matt G. Reynolds, Judge.
Suit by Rufus J. Lackland and others, constituting the Board of Trustees of the Missouri Botanical Garden, against Herbert S. Hadley, Attorney General of the State, and others. From a decree for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed and dismissed.
The board of trustees of the Missouri Botanical Garden created by the will of Henry Shaw, which was probated on the 21st day of September, 1889, brought this suit in equity to procure a decree declaring a trust for their benefit in a strip of land 200 feet wide, which, and other lands surrounded by it, was conveyed by Henry Shaw, in pursuance of an act of the Legislature of March 9, 1867 (Laws 1867, p. 172) for the establishment of Tower Grove Park, to the city of St. Louis by his deed of October 20, 1868, and a grant in confirmation, July 9, 1872. Said act of the General Assembly provided for the government of said park a board of commissioners consisting of from five to seven persons, of which board Mr. Henry Shaw was to be a member during his life, with the power of appointment of all other members. Said act gave the board power to prescribe rules and pass ordinances for the regulation of the park, and made a violation of such ordinances a misdemeanor. It required the city of St. Louis to issue and sell bonds aggregating $360,000, whose proceeds should be paid over to said board and applied by it to the improvement and administration of the park. It further required the city of St. Louis to provide by general taxation an annual maintenance fund of $25,000, to begin three years after the passage of the act. And it exempted all the land conveyed by Mr. Shaw in pursuance of its provisions from every form of taxation, and provided that such lands should be held in fee by the said city of St. Louis, and authorized said city to issue bonds for $50,000 for the purchase of certain adjoining lands, if needful.
Henry Shaw executed an indenture with the mayor of the city of St. Louis October 20, 1868, whereby he conveyed to it the lands by the same description given to them in the act of the Legislature, and the city assumed the covenants required of it by said act. Said indenture conveyed 276.76 acres, and located on this tract an outer rim of 200 feet wide, with openings or passageways to the inner park (as shown on a plat of the whole tract conveyed, which accompanied the deed and was made a part thereof) for leasing "upon long leases for villa residences, which should be an ornament to the park and source of revenue." The deed then vested the whole tract, to wit:
The supplemental deed is, to wit:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
German Evangelical Protestant Congregation of Church of Holy Ghost v. Schreiber
... ... heirs amounted to an assertion of their right to a reversion ... under the terms of the deed in question, equivalent to a ... re-entry ( Lackland v. Hadley, 260 Mo. 539, 169 S.W ... 275; Bredell v. College, 242 Mo. 317; ... [209 S.W. 917] ... Hoke v. Central Twp. Farmers' Club, 194 ... ...
-
Mentzer v. Mentzer
... ... 40; Roberts v. Crume, 173 Mo ... 572; Henry v. Mineral Water & Bottling Co., 277 Mo ... 508; Shafer v. Shafer, 190 S.W. 323; Lackland v ... Hadley, 260 Mo. 539; Stoutimore v. Ry. Co., 215 ... Mo.App. 194, 256 S.W. 121; Studdard v. Wells, 120 ... Mo. 25; Haydon v. Ry. Co., 222 ... ...
-
Mentzer v. Mentzer
...249 S.W. 40; Roberts v. Crume, 173 Mo. 572; Henry v. Mineral Water & Bottling Co., 277 Mo. 508; Shafer v. Shafer, 190 S.W. 323; Lackland v. Hadley, 260 Mo. 539; Stoutimore v. Ry. Co., 215 Mo. App. 194, 256 S.W. 121; Studdard v. Wells, 120 Mo. 25; Haydon v. Ry. Co., 222 Mo. 145; Anderson v. ......
-
Allison v. Cemetery Caretaking Company
... ... [Alward v. Boatwright, 193 ... S.W. 568; Catron v. Scarritt Collegiate Institute, ... 264 Mo. 713, 175 S.W. 571; Lackland v. Hadley, 260 ... Mo. 539, 570, 169 S.W. 275; Haydon v. Railroad, 222 ... Mo. 126, 138, 121 S.W. 15; Anderson v. Gaines, 156 ... Mo. 664, 670, 57 ... ...