Lafata v. 712 Fifth Ave. Associates
Decision Date | 28 April 1997 |
Citation | 657 N.Y.S.2d 947,238 A.D.2d 552 |
Parties | Aurelio LAFATA, et al., Respondents, v. 712 FIFTH AVENUE ASSOCIATES, et al., Appellants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Jacobowitz, Garfinkel & Lesman, New York City (Fiedelman & Hoefling, Jericho [Susan E. Lysaght], of counsel), for appellants.
Bruce Katz, New York City, for respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated May 3, 1996, which granted the plaintiffs' motion to vacate the automatic dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR 3404 and restored the action to the trial calendar conditioned on the payment of $500 by the plaintiffs' attorney to the defendants.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs' motion is denied.
A party seeking to restore a case which has been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404 must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the delay, the existence of a meritorious cause of action, an absence of intent to abandon the action, and lack of prejudice to the nonmoving party. All four components of the test must be satisfied for the dismissal to be properly vacated (see, Pellegrino v. St. Agnes Hosp., 216 A.D.2d 447, 628 N.Y.S.2d 540; Roland v. Napolitano, 209 A.D.2d 501, 619 N.Y.S.2d 77; Ornstein v. Kentucky Fried Chicken, 121 A.D.2d 610, 611, 503 N.Y.S.2d 643). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the required elements, and thus, the Supreme Court improperly granted their motion to restore (see, Roland v. Napolitano, supra; Rodriguez v. Hercules Chemical Co., 228 A.D.2d 319, 644 N.Y.S.2d 229; Friedberg v. Bay Ridge Orthopedic Assoc., 122 A.D.2d 194, 504 N.Y.S.2d 731).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
DiBetta v. Silberberg
...party. All four components of the test must be satisfied for the dismissal to be properly vacated.” ( Lafata v. 712 Fifth Ave. Assoc., 238 A.D.2d 552, 657 N.Y.S. 947 [1997] quoting Pellegrino v. St. Agnes Hosp., 216 A.D.2d 447;Roland v. Napolitano, 209 A.D.2d 501;Ornstein v. Kentucky Fried ......
-
Aguilar v. Djonvic
...v Javind Apt. Corp., 246 A.D.2d 353, 355). All four components of this test must be met before dismissal can be vacated (Lafata v 712 Fifth Ave. Assocs., 238 A.D.2d 552). Plaintiffs failed to establish a valid excuse for the more than two-year delay in moving to restore the matter to the tr......
- McCarthy v. Klein
- 101 North Broadway Associates v. Board of Assessors of Town of Riverhead