Lake View School Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee

Decision Date22 January 2004
Docket NumberNo. 01-836.,01-836.
Citation142 S.W.3d 643,355 Ark. 617
PartiesLAKE VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 OF PHILLIPS COUNTY, Arkansas, et al. v. Governor Mike HUCKABEE, et al.
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers & Sneddon, by: Clayton R. Blackstock and Mark Burnette, Little Rock, for amicus curiae Arkansas Education Association.

Kaplan, Brewer, Maxey & Haralson, P.A., by: Regina Haralson, Little Rock, for amicus curiae Arkansas Public Policy Panel.

PER CURIAM.

Because of noncompliance with the November 21, 2002, opinion of this court, we recall our mandate in this case forthwith. This court will appoint a master, whom we will name, and we will delineate his or her responsibilities by per curiam. Under Amendment 80, § 2(E), this court has the power to issue and determine any and all writs necessary in aid of its jurisdiction and to delegate to its several justices the power to issue such writs. This court will consider and decide what remedy or writ is proper to assure compliance.

Special Justice CAROL DALBY joins.

HANNAH, J., concurs.

IMBER, J., not participating.

JIM HANNAH, Justice, concurring.

Because this court certainly has jurisdiction to recall its mandate, and because it is apparent that a noncompliance hearing is going to be held, I concur. However, I do not see that it matters whether that hearing occurs at the circuit court level where the new action is currently pending or as a result of recalling the mandate. I am concerned about the precedent we may be setting.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • King v. State
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • May 24, 2012
    ...of funding education violated the Arkansas Constitution) (mandate recalled on other grounds by Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 355 Ark. 617, 142 S.W.3d 643 (2004) (per curiam) and Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 362 Ark. 520, 210 S.W.3d 28 (2005)); Serrano v. Priest, 18 Ca......
  • Coalition for Educ. Equity v. Heineman
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • May 11, 2007
    ...___ S.W.3d ___ (2005); Lake View School Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 362 Ark. 520, 210 S.W.3d 28 (2005); Lake View School Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 355 Ark. 617, 142 S.W.3d 643 (2004). 82. Montoy, supra note 22. 83. See Montoy v. State, 278 Kan. 769, 102 P.3d 1160 (2005). 84. Montoy v. State, ......
  • Lake View School Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • June 9, 2005
    ...this court has jurisdiction to recall its mandate and appoint masters to make findings of fact. See Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 355 Ark. 617, 142 S.W.3d 643 (2004) (per curiam). See also Ark. Const. amend. 80, § We further made it radiantly clear in our supplemental opinion han......
  • Lake View School Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • December 15, 2005
    ...have jurisdiction to recall our mandate and address the motions filed by the Rogers School District. See Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 355 Ark. 617, 142 S.W.3d 643 (2004). With respect to the remaining issues addressed by the Masters, we hold that the General Assembly failed to c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT