Laker v. Royal Fraternal Union
Decision Date | 27 May 1902 |
Parties | LAKER v. ROYAL FRATERNAL UNION. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
1. A fraternal benefit society issued a certificate to a member, which provided that, on receipt of satisfactory proofs of death, $2,000 should be paid his wife; that the benefits accruing under the certificate should be payable on the annuity system—a specific sum quarterly until the full amount should be paid. In the application for insurance and in the certificate the member agreed that the constitution and by-laws should be a part of the certificate. By-law 108 provided for monthly assessments, and conferred authority to levy and collect such additional assessments as might be necessary to provide for the payment of accrued benefits and expenses. By-law 183 required the supreme executive committee to pass on and examine all claims for benefits, and to order their payment first from the benefit fund; then out of the reserve fund, if necessary; and then pro rata in case of the insufficiency of both funds. By-law 209 limited the liability of the society for a death benefit to "the amount of one assessment actually realized for the benefit fund from the membership in force * * * for the month in which the death occurs," and not exceeding the amount of the certificate. Held, that the beneficiary in the certificate was entitled to $2,000 on the death of the member, and not merely to the amount realized from one assessment, as provided in by-law 209.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Greene County; James T. Neville, Judge.
Action by Medora E. C. Laker against the Royal Fraternal Union. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Vaughan & Coltrane, for appellant. Millard R. Powers and Carlos S. Hardy, for respondent.
The suit is to recover the fourth installment of $125, claimed to be due plaintiff as the beneficiary in the benefit certificate issued by the defendant to Frederick W. Laker. The contents of the certificate, material to this controversy, are as follows:
Defendant pleaded two special defenses: First, that the plaintiff's claim had not been submitted to arbitrators as provided for by the certificate, constitution, and by-laws of the defendant order; second, by-law No. 209, which reads as follows, to wit: — which the answer alleges was in force when the benefit certificate was issued to F. W. Laker, and that it entered into and formed a part of the contract of insurance; that on March 23, 1898, said by-law was duly amended by the supreme trustees of the order, and, as amended, reads as follows: — and "that said Frederick W. Laker, for himself and on behalf of his beneficiary, assented and agreed to its terms and conditions; that the amount of one assessment actually realized for the benefit fund from all the membership in force in division two for the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lewine v. Supreme Lodge K. of P. of W.
...speaking, the cases with unanimity either so decide or proceed in affirmance of this fundamental proposition. Laker v. Fraternal Ass'n, 95 Mo. App. 353, 75 S. W. 705; Richmond v. Supreme Lodge, 110 Mo. App. 8, 19, 71 S. W. 736; Grand Lodge v. Sater, 44 Mo. App. 445; Supreme Council v. Curd,......
-
Propst v. Capital Mut. Assn.
...being nothing inconsistent between the provisions of the two, they should be construed together. [45 C.J., p. 34; Laker v. The Royal Fraternal Union, 95 Mo. App. 353.] It is apparent that no proofs were furnished as provided by the by-laws. However, we think there was evidence tending to sh......
-
Lewine v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias of World
...... Mo. 129; State v. Merchants' Exchange, 72 Mo. 146; National Union v. Marlow, 74 F. 775;. Commonwealth v. Weatherby, 105 Mass. 148; ... destroy the right absolutely. Morton v. Royal Tribe of. Joseph, 93 Mo.App. 78; Richmond v. Supreme. Lodge, 100 ...554] this. fundamental proposition. [ Laker v. Fraternal Assn., . 95 Mo.App. 353, 75 S.W. 705; Richmond v. Sup. ......
-
Kribs v. United Order of Foresters
...2021. (b) The application, the certificate and the by-laws formed the contract. Richmond v. Supreme Lodge, 100 Mo.App. 19; Laker v. Royal Union, 95 Mo.App. 353; Slater v. K. & L. H., 76 Mo.App. 387; Sheele Lodge, 63 Mo.App. 277; State ex rel v. Benev. Soc., 42 Mo.App. 488. (6) The statutes ......