Lakey v. State
Decision Date | 28 August 2015 |
Docket Number | No. 5D13–3277.,5D13–3277. |
Citation | 172 So.3d 989 (Mem) |
Parties | Chad Edward LAKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
William R. Ponall, of Snure & Ponall, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
Appellant, Chad Edward Lakey, seeks review of three trial court orders denying his motions requesting: 1) to be resentenced upon remand from this court; 2) to correct a sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) ; and 3) to disqualify the trial judge. We affirm the denial of the motion to disqualify. However, because Lakey is entitled to be sentenced under a corrected scoresheet, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Lakey was originally sentenced to 150 months in the Department of Corrections on three counts relating to sexual battery upon a child. The sentencing scoresheet called for a lowest permissible sentence of 149.25 months' imprisonment. Upon direct appeal, this court affirmed Counts I and III but reversed on Count II due to an error in a jury instruction. The State subsequently entered a nolle prosequi on Count II. Because there were no pending charges at that time, the trial court did not err in denying Lakey's motion for resentencing. See Pennington v. State, 120 So.3d 647, 648 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) .
Lakey then filed a motion to correct a sentencing error under rule 3.800(b)(2). He argued that the record did not establish that he would have received the same sentence without the victim injury points from Count II. “When a sentencing error is challenged by ... a 3.800(b) claim ... a scoresheet error is ‘harmless if the record conclusively shows that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence using a correct scoresheet.’ ” Richards v. State, 76 So.3d 29, 30 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (quoting Brooks v. State, 969 So.2d 238, 241 (Fla.2007) ). The closeness of the 150 months' imprisonment to the original guideline sentence of 149.25 months indicates an intention to sentence consistently with the scoresheet. See Daniels v. State, 114 So.3d 1108, 1110 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (). The record does not conclusively show that Lakey would have received the same sentence with an amended scoresheet.
Furthermore,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Guadalupe v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.
... ... Finding no prejudice, we ... affirm ... I ... On ... January 15, 2015, the State of Florida filed an Information ... in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, charging Daniel ... Guadalupe ("Petitioner") with three ... likely Petitioner would have received a lesser sentence had ... the scoresheet reflected the correct minimum. See Lakey ... v. State, 172 So.3d 989, 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015) ... In this ... case, the judge sentenced Petitioner ... ...
-
Vereen v. State
...2019 WL 140825 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 9, 2019) (finding Alleyne inapplicable to "scoring of victim injury points") with Lakey v. State , 172 So.3d 989 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ("Because the jury did not make a specific finding of penetration rather than union, it was improper to include points for p......
-
Post-conviction relief
...to sentence consistently with the score-sheet. As such, reversed and remanded to resentence with a corrected scoresheet. Lakey v. State, 172 So. 3d 989 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) Defendant who was sentenced to life imprisonment was entitled to credit for any time spent in jail awaiting trial on th......