Lamberti v. Plaza Equities, LLC

Decision Date09 May 2018
Docket Number2015–06766,Index No. 5244/13
Citation77 N.Y.S.3d 420,161 A.D.3d 837
Parties Mary M. LAMBERTI, appellant, v. PLAZA EQUITIES, LLC, et al., respondents, et al., defendants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

161 A.D.3d 837
77 N.Y.S.3d 420

Mary M. LAMBERTI, appellant,
v.
PLAZA EQUITIES, LLC, et al., respondents, et al., defendants.

2015–06766
Index No. 5244/13

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Argued—December 12, 2017
May 9, 2018


77 N.Y.S.3d 422

Michael T. Lamberti, New York, NY, for appellant.

Lawrence and Walsh, P.C., Hempstead, N.Y. (Eric P. Wainer of counsel), for respondents Plaza Equities, LLC, PE–NC, LLC, Petrina (Cherardi) Macaluso, and Scott Kiley, individually and as temporary administrator of the estate of John R. Kiley.

Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Breitstone, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Loretta M. Gastwirth and Thomas McGowan of counsel), for respondent Private Capital Group, LLC.

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Angela G. Iannacci, J.), entered March 31, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendant Private Capital Group, LLC, and the defendants Plaza Equities, LLC, and PE–NC, LLC, which were pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against each of them, and granted that branch of the separate motion of the defendants Petrina (Cherardi) Macaluso and Scott Kiley, individually and as temporary administrator of the estate of John R. Kiley, which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against them.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

In 1998, the plaintiff, Mary M. Lamberti, obtained a loan in the sum of $300,000 from Greenpoint Mortgage Corp. (hereinafter Greenpoint Mortgage), evidenced by a note and secured by a mortgage encumbering real property in Woodbury, New York. In 2004, an alleged default by Lamberti was settled by stipulation. However, in 2005, Greenpoint Mortgage commenced a mortgage foreclosure action alleging that Lamberti defaulted again. While the foreclosure action was pending, the note and mortgage were assigned several times, first to Copperfield Investments, LLC (hereinafter Copperfield), then to Private Capital Group, LLC (hereinafter Private Capital), subsequently to Plaza Equities, LLC (hereinafter Plaza Equities), and finally to PE–NC, LLC (hereinafter PE–NC).

On an appeal in the foreclosure action, this Court affirmed an order dated October 13, 2010, which, inter alia, denied a motion by Lamberti to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her for lack of standing and granted that branch of a motion by Plaza Equities which was to be added as a party plaintiff (see Greenpoint Mtge. Corp. v. Lamberti , 94 A.D.3d 815, 941 N.Y.S.2d 864 ). On another appeal in the foreclosure action, this Court affirmed so much of an order entered March

77 N.Y.S.3d 423

12, 2012, as denied that branch of a motion by Lamberti which was for leave to renew a prior cross motion to dismiss the complaint (see Plaza Equities, LLC v. Lamberti , 118...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Lennon v. 56th & Park(NY) Owner, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 15, 2021
    ...478, 712 N.E.2d 647 ; Ryan v. New York Tel. Co., 62 N.Y.2d at 500–501, 478 N.Y.S.2d 823, 467 N.E.2d 487 ; Lamberti v. Plaza Equities, LLC, 161 A.D.3d 837, 839, 77 N.Y.S.3d 420 ). Collateral estoppel is described as a flexible doctrine, and a determination of whether a party had a full and f......
  • Lennon v. 56th & Park (NY) Owner, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • September 15, 2021
    ... ... 349; Ryan v New York Tel. Co. , 62 N.Y.2d at 500-501; ... Lamberti v Plaza Equities, LLC , 161 A.D.3d 837, ... 839). Collateral estoppel is described as a ... ...
  • Magee-Boyle v. Reliastar Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 26, 2019
    ...N.Y.S.2d 18 ; Gordon v. Muchnick, 180 A.D.2d 715, 579 N.Y.S.2d 745 ) and negligent misrepresentation (see Lamberti v. Plaza Equities, LLC, 161 A.D.3d 837, 839–840, 77 N.Y.S.3d 420 ; Simmons v. Allstate Indem. Co., 112 A.D.3d 611, 975 N.Y.S.2d 899 ). RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, DUFFY and IANNACC......
  • 23 E. 39TH St. Developer, LLC v. 23 E. 39TH St. Mgmt. Corp., 2016–13440
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 15, 2019
    ...Inc., 164 A.D.3d at 488, 83 N.Y.S.3d 227 ; Feng Li v. Peng, 161 A.D.3d 823, 825–826, 76 N.Y.S.3d 230 ; Lamberti v. Plaza Equities, LLC, 161 A.D.3d 837, 839, 77 N.Y.S.3d 420 ). "[T]he burden rests upon the proponent of collateral estoppel to demonstrate the identicality and decisiveness of t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT