Land v. Adams
Decision Date | 05 March 1921 |
Docket Number | No. 21727.,21727. |
Citation | 229 S.W. 158 |
Parties | LAND et al. v. ADAMS et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Randolph County; A. W. Walker, Judge.
Suit to contest a will by Correnna Land and others against Fratie Davis Adams and others. From judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Judgment affirmed.
Sam C. Major, of Fayette, and M. J. Lilly, of Moberly, for appellants.
J. W. Wight and J. H. Whitecotton, both of `Moberly, for respondents.
I. Appeal front the circuit court of Randolph county. Suit to contest the will of Joseph Lessley, Sr. The contestants, Correnna Land and Cole Younger Baker, are daughters, and Joseph Lessley, Jr., is a son of the deceased. The proponents, Fratie Davis Adams, Susie J. Ryan, and Fannie Ham are daughters, and Frank M. Lessley is a son, of said deceased. Said seven children were all the children of said deceased when he made his will and when he died.
The grounds of contest are: First, want of mental capacity; second, fraud and artifice perpetrated upon the testator, and undue influence exerted over his mind by Fratie Davis Adams and her husband, Blackford Adams; third, that by mistake of the scrivener the will was not drawn in accordance with the testator's directions. The answer of the proponents put the grounds of contest in issue.
The will in question was dated July 31, 1916. Omitting the formal parts and the clause appointing G. R. Rennolds executor, the will was as follows:
"I give, devise and bequeath to my beloved daughter, Fratie Davis Adams an undivided two sevenths interest in all of the real estate, which I may own at my death, of whatever kind or description and wherever situate, absolutely, and I give, devise and bequeath the remaining five sevenths undivided interest in said real estate to my beloved daughters, Susie J. Ryan, Fannie Ham, Correnna Land and Cole Younger Baker and to my beloved son Joseph Lessley Jr., and Frank M. Lessley, share and share alike, absolutely."
To establish their prima fade case, the proponents first introduced the following testimony:
F. M. Tymony testified:
That he resided at Higbee, where the deceased lived, and had known the deceased since witness was a boy. The day the will was executed the little grandson of the deceased, the son of his daughter, Mrs. Adams, came to witness at the Citizens' Bank and said his grandfather wanted him to tell Judge Hines to come down to deceased's house, and asked him what he wanted, and he said he had sent for Mr. Hines to have a contract written. Witness then told him that Mr. Hines was absent, but the testator said to bring down Charlie Hon; he could write it as good as Judge Hines. Witness then went to the bank, and Hon had his car there, and they both returned to Mr. Lessley's house. Mr. Lessley told Hon that he wanted him to draw up a contract; "he said, he wanted to divide his property and give Fratie two shares — Mrs. Adams to have two shares," and the other shares to go to the other children. Charlie Hon asked him how many children he had. He said seven. Hon said he would have to give her (Mrs. Adams) two-sevenths. But Hon had said he could not write a contract, but could write a will. Mr. Hon drew up the will, and read it over to the testator. After hearing it read over, testator said it was all right. He wanted to give Fratie two-sevenths. That was the way he wanted it. Testator said he would have to have two witnesses to his will. He wanted Dr. Nichols, but he had gone to the country. They waited some time, but he did not come, and Mr. Hon said, "We can sign it," and testator said, "All right." Hon signed the testator's name, `and then testator made his mark — that was all he could do. Then Hon and witness signed their names as witnesses. Testator was 80-odd years old. The Lessley and Adams houses adjoined, no fence between them. Testator himself attended to his financial business; never knew of any one assisting. Testator was in good shape. There was no question, his mental condition; it was as good as ever.
Charles C. Hon testified:
He resided in Higbee, and had been cashier of the Citizens' Bank there for 11 years, and had known deceased during that time. Had an account at bank once or twice, but none when witness wrote his will. Mr. Tymony came up to the bank, and said Uncle Joe Lessley wanted somebody to draw up some kind of a paper for him. He thought he wanted to do something with his property. "I asked him, if he wanted a will drawn, and I don't just remember what he told me. I put some blank paper in my pocket, and a printed form of a will. Then Mr. Tymony and myself went down to Mr. Lessley's in my car.
On cross-examination witness said:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Clark v. Skinner
...908. (b) There was no showing of undue influence, and such undue influence will not be presumed. Van Raalte v. Graff, 299 Mo. 527; Land v. Adams, 229 S.W. 158; Adams v. Kendrick, 11 S.W. (2d) 25; Knadler v. Stelzer, 19 S.W. (2d) STURGIS, C. This is a suit to set aside and declare void two w......
-
Clark v. Skinner
...908. (b) There was no showing of undue influence, and such undue influence will not be presumed. Van Raalte v. Graff, 299 Mo. 527; Land v. Adams, 229 S.W. 158; Adams Kendrick, 11 S.W.2d 25; Knadler v. Stelzer, 19 S.W.2d 1054. Sturgis, C. Ferguson and Hyde, CC., concur. OPINION STURGIS This ......
-
Bushman v. Barlow
...appellant over the mind of her mother. Winn v. Grier, 217 Mo. 420; Norton v. Paxton, 110 Mo. 467; Wood v. Carpenter, 166 Mo. 478; Loud v. Adams, 229 S.W. 158; Spurr Spurr, 226 S.W. 35; Sandford v. Holland, 276 Mo. 470; Berberet v. Berberet, 131 Mo. 399; Kleinlin v. Krause, 209 S.W. 933; Pag......
-
Raalte v. Graff
...did not establish a confidential or fiduciary relation between Rosa Graff and Jacob Lampert. Kischman v. Scott, 166 Mo. 214; Land v. Adams, 229 S.W. 158, 163; In Brand, 173 N.Y.S. 169; Campbell v. Carlisle, 162 Mo. 634; Smith v. Williams, 221 S.W. 360; 2 Words and Phrases, p. 1423; 2 Pomero......