Larkin v. State
| Citation | 247 Ga. 586,278 S.E.2d 365 |
| Decision Date | 14 May 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 37083,37083 |
| Parties | LARKIN v. The STATE. |
| Court | Supreme Court of Georgia |
A. Frank Grimsley, Cordele, for appellant.
Gary C. Christy, Dist. Atty., Cordele, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for appellee.
Fred Larkin, Jr. was convicted of murdering his mother-in-law, Ida Mae Rawls Williams, and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals. We affirm.
1. Larkin argues that, even if all conflicts in the evidence are resolved so as to support the jury's verdict, the record does not authorize a rational trier of fact to find him guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. See, Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 326, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2793, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1978). Specifically, Larkin argues the absence of sufficient evidence to authorize a rational trier of fact to find he caused his mother-in-law's death.
The record establishes that, on January 20, 1980, Larkin attacked his wife in the presence of his mother-in-law, and, that, when his mother-in-law grabbed his coat collar to prevent further violence, Larkin stabbed her with a butcher knife (the wound was 6 to 8 inches deep into the right side of the mother-in-law's abdomen).
On January 30, 1980, immediately following an operation to restitch the wound (infection had caused the wounded tissue to swell and thus the original stitches to separate), the mother-in-law died from a pulmonary embolus a complication caused by the surgery.
Where one inflicts an unlawful injury, such injury is the proximate cause of death if the injury "directly and materially contributed to the happening of a subsequent accruing immediate cause of the death." Ward v. State, 238 Ga. 367, 369, 233 S.E.2d 175 (1977).
This enumeration of error is without merit.
2. Larkin argues that Code Ann. § 26-1101(b) is unconstitutional, under the doctrine of due process, because it permits a conviction of felony-murder to be predicated upon an underlying felony which is itself a part of the homicide.
In Baker v. State, 236 Ga. 754, 225 S.E.2d 269 (1976), where this court held that Georgia law did permit a conviction of felony-murder to be predicated upon an underlying felony which is itself a part of the homicide, this court also expressly noted that such law did not violate the doctrine of due process. Id., at 755, 225 S.E.2d 269.
This enumeration of error is without merit.
3. Larkin argues that the trial court erred in denying his request for a charge on involuntary...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
The State v. Jackson
...conduct of the appellant in perpetrating the robbery constituted the proximate cause of the death of the deceased”); Larkin v. State, 247 Ga. 586, 587, 278 S.E.2d 365 (1981) (upholding felony murder conviction against the defendant's claim that the evidence was insufficient to show that “he......
-
Neal v. State, S11A1663.
...v. State, 266 Ga. 758, 760(2)(b), 470 S.E.2d 884 (1996); Bishop v. State, 257 Ga. 136, 140(2), 356 S.E.2d 503 (1987); Larkin v. State, 247 Ga. 586(1), 278 S.E.2d 365 (1981). In short, the jury was authorized to reject the theoretical possibility of causation offered by Neal. See Shields v. ......
-
Brown v. the State.
...proximately occasioned by a pre-existing cause.Wilson v. State, 190 Ga. 824, 829, 10 S.E.2d 861 (1940). See also Larkin v. State, 247 Ga. 586(1), 278 S.E.2d 365 (1981) (“[w]here one inflicts an unlawful injury, such injury is the proximate cause of death if the injury ‘directly and material......
-
Brown v. State
...statutes in force in those jurisdictions. See, e.g., People v. Johnson, (1974) 38 Cal.App.3d 1, 112 Cal.Rptr. 834; Larkin v. State, (1981) 247 Ga. 586, 278 S.E.2d 365; State v. Grooms, (1980) 47 Or.App. 1001, 615 P.2d 1130. In a Michigan case cited by appellant in which the Supreme Court of......