Lasater v. Fant
Decision Date | 02 December 1897 |
Citation | 43 S.W. 321 |
Parties | LASATER et al. v. FANT. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Action by D. R. Fant against Ed. C. Lasater and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error. Reversed.
G. R. Scott & Bro., for defendant in error.
An action of forcible entry and detainer was instituted before a justice of the peace of Hidalgo county, on the following complaint:
Citation was issued by the justice of the peace, which commanded the officer to summon the said E. C. Lasater or R. H. Rice, agent. The return of the officer states that the writ was executed by citing R. H. Rice, agent, for E. C. Lasater, etc. The case was tried September 21, 1896, and a judgment was rendered reciting the appearance of the plaintiff by N. L. Word, agent, and of the defendant by R. H. Rice, agent, and reciting the trial and the verdict of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bourdreaux v. Tucson Gas, Elec. Light & Power Co.
...of Illinois and followed by the supreme court of Kansas. They are Railroad Co. v. Campbell, 170 Ill. 163, 49 N.E. 314; Lasater v. Fant (Tex. Civ. App.), 43 S.W. 321; M., K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Bagley, 65 Kan. 188, 69 189, 3 L.R.A., N.S., 259. The supreme court of Kansas in the Bagley case, last......
-
Keppler v. Becker
... ... 69 P. 189, 3 L.R.A. (N.S.) 259; Doyle v. City of ... Sycamore, 193 Ill. 501, 61 N.E. 1117; Bricken v ... Cross, 163 Mo. 449, 64 S.W. 99; Lasater v. Fant, (Tex ... Civ. App.) 43 S.W. 321 ... Statutes ... such as that here under consideration must be strictly ... construed. Sea ... ...
-
White v. Veitch
...Tiffany L. & T. p. 1786.) See also Gulledge v. White, 73 Tex. 498, 11 S.W. 527; Laffey v. Chapman, 9 Colo. 304; 12 P. 152; Lasater v. Fant (Tex. Civ. App.) 43 S.W. 321; Conley v. Conley, 78 Wis. 665, 47 N.W. 950, where was said that the reasoning is but an application of the doctrine applie......
-
The Missouri v. Bagley
...314; Eylenfeldt v. Steel Co., 165 id. 185, 46 N.E. 266; R. R. Co. v. Lacey, 49 Ga. 106 Phelps v. R. R. Co., 94, Ill. 548; Lasater v. Fant, Tex. Cir. App., 43 S.W. 321; Sicard v. Davis, 6 Pet. 124, 8 L.Ed. It has been suggested that section 23 of the civil code (Gen. Stat. 1901, § 4451) save......