Latisha H. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Dior S.)

Decision Date12 April 2018
Docket Number6258,6259
Citation74 N.Y.S.3d 40,160 A.D.3d 495
Parties IN RE DIOR S., and Another, Children under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Latisha H., Respondent–Appellant, v. Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

160 A.D.3d 495
74 N.Y.S.3d 40

IN RE DIOR S., and Another, Children under Eighteen Years of Age, etc.,

Latisha H., Respondent–Appellant,
v.
Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

6258
6259

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

ENTERED: APRIL 12, 2018


Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Jessica Miller of counsel), for respondent.

Dawne Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Clement of counsel), attorney for the children.

Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Webber, Moulton, JJ.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about February 22, 2017, to the extent it brings up for review a fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about December 2, 2016, which found that respondent mother neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the fact-finding order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of disposition.

Petitioner agency proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the mother neglected the children by failing to treat her mental illness (see Family Ct. Act §§ 1012[f][i][B] ; 1046[b][i]; Matter of Michael P. [Orthensia H.], 137 A.D.3d 499, 500, 27 N.Y.S.3d 123 [1st Dept. 2016] ). The grandmother's testimony about the mother's violent behavior toward her and the mother's admission that she was diagnosed with bipolar disorder raised the substantial probability that the mother's failure to treat her mental illness would place the children at imminent risk of impairment if released to her care (see Matter of Enrique S. [Kelba C.S.], 134 A.D.3d 576, 577, 23 N.Y.S.3d 30 [1st Dept. 2015], lv denied 27 N.Y.3d 948, 29 N.Y.S.3d 910, 49 N.E.3d 1203 [2016] ). In addition, the testimony about the April 3, 2016 incident demonstrated that the mother's untreated mental illness not only created an imminent risk of harm to the children, but...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Enerfry H. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. for the City of N.Y. (In re Another)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • October 14, 2021
    ...case by showing that he was regularly participating in treatment ( Family Court Act § 1046[a][iii] ; Matter of Dior S. [Latisha H.], 160 A.D.3d 495, 496, 74 N.Y.S.3d 40 [1st Dept. 2018] ). The court properly drew a negative inference from the fact that respondent, while present at the heari......
  • In re Adonis H.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • October 14, 2021
    ...facie case by showing that he was regularly participating in treatment (Family Court Act § 1046[a][iii]; Matter of Dior S. [Latisha H.], 160 A.D.3d 495, 496 [1st Dept 2018]). The court properly drew a negative inference from the fact that respondent, while present at the hearing, did not te......
  • In re Adonis H.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • October 14, 2021
    ...facie case by showing that he was regularly participating in treatment (Family Court Act § 1046[a][iii]; Matter of Dior S. [Latisha H.], 160 A.D.3d 495, 496 [1st Dept 2018]). The court properly drew a negative inference from the fact that respondent, while present at the hearing, did not te......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT