LAWNWOOD MEDICAL CENTER, INC. v. Lloyd, 4D00-504.

Decision Date20 December 2000
Docket NumberNo. 4D00-504.,4D00-504.
Citation773 So.2d 114
PartiesLAWNWOOD MEDICAL CENTER, INC. d/b/a Lawnwood Regional Medical Center, a Florida corporation; Richard Allen, M.D., Scott Katzman, M .D., Giraldo Cepeda, M.D., Juliette Lomax-Homier, M.D., Kevin O'Loughlin, M.D., Harold Schulman, M.D., James Roberts, M.D., Prithvi Sawh, M.D., Robert Anderson, D.O., and Robin Connolly, M.D.; individually and as purported members of the Medical Executive Committee of Lawnwood Medical Center, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Perry R. LLOYD, III, M.D.; David Fromang, M.D.; Ezra Marshall, M.D.; and Ramesh Nayyar, M.D.; individually and on behalf of similarly situated physicians on the Medical Staff of Lawnwood Medical Center, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Jennifer S. Carroll and Diane F. Medley of Law Offices of Jennifer S. Carroll, P.A., and Francis B. Geary, Jr. of Geary & Johnson, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants/ cross-appellees.

James W. Beasley, Jr. and Robert J. Hauser of Beasley, Leacock & Hauser, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees/ cross-appellants.

Mark S. Thomas, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Amicus Curiae-State of Florida, Agency for Health Care Administration.

John M. Knight, Tallahassee, for Amicus Curiae-Florida Medical Association, and Michael L. Ile, Anne M. Murphy and Leonard A. Nelson, Chicago, Illinois, for Amicus Curiae-American Medical Association.

SHAHOOD, J.

We affirm the Amended Temporary Injunction entered by the trial court in this case. However, because the court set the bond in this case without allowing appellants an opportunity to address the bond amount, we remand to the trial court to set and conduct an expedited hearing to redetermine the amount of bond.

Appellees raise on cross-appeal the propriety of some of the trial court's rulings that allowed into evidence certain items. These claims are not raised in relation to the injunctive order on appeal, which appellees do not challenge. Instead, the rulings are challenged in order to prevent the use of the evidence in future proceedings. For that purpose, the rulings are not presently reviewable. They are similar to a denial of a motion in limine. Such rulings are not covered by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3), which enumerates the non-final orders which are appealable. See In re Estate of Hayward, 463 So.2d 446 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)

. Also, the rulings are not reviewable through certiorari because an...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • LAWNWOOD Med. Ctr. INC. v. SADOW
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 24, 2010
    ...opened. 7. See Lloyd v. Lawnwood Med. Ctr., Inc., 2000 WL 309305 (Fla. 19th Cir. Feb. 16, 2000). 8. See Lawnwood Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Lloyd, 773 So.2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). 9. Conspicuously, the evidence does not show Pentz correcting or stopping Dunwoody from making these comments, but ap......
  • Lawnwood Medical Center, Inc. v. Seeger
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • August 28, 2008
    ...Walker v. Lawnwood Med. Ctr., Inc., No. 99-159 CA 03 (Fla. 19th Cir.Ct.1999) (order granting preliminary injunction)) aff'd, 773 So.2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The trial court order in Walker enumerated various options other than Lawnwood's unilateral suspension of the doctors that Lawnwood......
  • Wilson v. State, No. 4D00-53
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 2000

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT