Lawrence v. Board of Selectmen of Egremont

Decision Date07 March 1966
Citation350 Mass. 354,214 N.E.2d 893
PartiesThomas C. LAWRENCE et al. v. BOARD OF SELECTMEN OF EGREMONT et al.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

No argument or brief for plaintiffs.

Sidney Q. Curtiss, Town Counsel, for defendants.

Before SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, KIRK, SPIEGEL and REARDON, JJ.

REARDON, Justice.

The plaintiffs brought this bill to enjoin the selectmen and the cemetery commissioners of the town of Egremont from further trespass on land in the town, title to which is in dispute. A Superior Court judge entered an interloctory decree confirming a master's report which found the plaintiffs to be owners in fee of the locus, and a final decree ordering the defendants to refrain from any further acts of trespass and to restore the premises to the condition in which they were prior to such trespasses already committed. Damages were awarded the plaintiffs in the sum of $1,000. The case is here on the defendants' appeal from both decrees.

The locus comprises approximately four and a half acres of land in Egremont (the town), and is adjacent to a half acre cemetery which has been in use since before 1800 and which is fenced off from the locus. It is claimed that title to the locus is in the town. The master found in part as follows.

In 1757, the proprietors of Egremont, which was not then incorporated as a town or district, voted in two meetings to set aside about five acres of land for a 'Meeting house Spot,' and in 1758 they empowered a committee to lay out all 'burial places.' The precise location of these lands and whether the votes were ever carried out does not appear from existing records. In 1767 a wood frame meeting house was erected at or near the intersection of two roads and somewhere close to the locus. The town was incorporated in 1775, a Congregational Church and Society having been organized about 1770, with the Reverend Eliphalet Steel as first ordained minister and clerk, which positions he held until his dismissal in 1794. The Church ceased to exist in 1814 after various difficulties but was reorganized in 1816. By a deed in 1772, Robert Joyner 'for and in Consideration of the Esteem Love Good Will and Affection which I bear and bear towards My loving Friend Revnd. Pastor and Worthy Teacher Mr. Eliphalet Steel of Egremont afforesaid Clerk' granted 'to the said Mr. Steel his Heirs and Assigns forever' a certain parcel of land containing five acres, bounds of which began at a heap of stones on the north side of the Meeting House in Egremont, 'To Have and to Hold * * * unto the said Mr. Steel his Heirs & Assigns from henceforth as his and their own Right of Inheritance forever without any Manner of Condition whatsoever.' The description of the land was based upon references to boundary marks which cannot now be identified, thus making present location of the site impossible. Eliphalet Steel was found by the master to have taken title to the land as an individual and not in any representative capacity. There is no record of any subsequent deed from him to the town of the land conveyed to him by Robert Joyner nor any record of the town's otherwise acquiring title to this five acre parcel, wherever it might be.

A small enclosed cemetery, one half acre in size, was established sometime prior to 1800, somewhat northerly of the intersection of the two town roads. The first reference to the cemetery in the chain of record title to the locus appeared in a warranty deed from Octavius Joyner to his son, Seymour Joyner, in 1825, which deed conveyed certain land, including the locus. Expressly reserved from the land conveyed by that deed and at its southwest corner was the burying ground 'agreeable to a lease * * * executed to Andrew Bacon Plynna Karner Samuel Newman and others the 11th November AD 1816.' The lease, which was to representatives of the Egremont Church, was never recorded at the registry of deeds and has disappeared. In 1865 Seymour Joyner conveyed to the town the burial ground, described as containing 'seventy two Square rods of Ground * * * excepting and reserving however from the said premises a portion of the same Eighteen feet wide extending from the Southerly to the Northerly line thereof for a place of burial: and also reserving the fruit trees growing upon all the above premises, and the aforesaid town shall by virtue of these premises keep at its own expense the premises inclosed with a proper and appropriate fence.' A deed in 1869 from the heirs of Seymour Joyner conveyed to one Baldwin the land which Joyner had owned 'reserving the burying ground.' The premises originally owned by Joyner were then conveyed in a number of successive deeds all but two of which made no mention of the cemetery. Finally in January, 1957, the premises were conveyed to the plaintiffs as tenants by the entirety. The plaintiffs first received notice in 1959 of the claim of the town to the land adjoining the cemetery enclosure but 'took no legal action until after town officials began work on said land in 1962.' In May of that year the plaintiffs found one of the selectmen excavating and grading with a bulldozer on the land immediately south of the enclosed cemetery. He had been hired as a contractor by the cemetery commissioners to to the work at town expense. The commissioners have caused a gravel roadway from a town road nearby to be built around three sides of the cemetery enclosure. Stakes and posts have been set in the ground and other work has been done by the town.

It is claimed that the 1772 deed...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Congregational Church of Chicopee Falls v. Attorney General
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • November 2, 1978
    ...among the people generally." Sears v. Attorney Gen., 193 Mass. 551, 555, 79 N.E. 772, 774 (1907). Cf. Lawrence v. Selectmen of Egremont, 350 Mass. 354, 358, 214 N.E.2d 893 (1966); 4 A. W. Scott, Trusts § 371.3 (3d ed. 1967).6 Davenport v. Attorney Gen., 361 Mass. 372, 280 N.E.2d 193 (1972),......
  • Albre Marble & Tile Co. v. Goverman
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 22, 1968
    ...found by him are thus conclusive unless they are on their face mutually inconsistent or plainly wrong. Lawrence v. Board of Selectmen of Egremont, 350 Mass. 354, 357, 214 N.E.2d 893, and cases cited, Rule 90 of the Superior Court (1954). While the unduly lengthy and discursive master's repo......
  • Town Bank & Trust Co. v. Eaton
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • December 10, 1970
    ...the facts found by the master are conclusive unless they are mutually inconsistent or plainly wrong. Lawrence v. Board of Selectmen of Egremont, 350 Mass. 354, 357, 214 N.E.2d 893. We are of opinion that the findings were neither inconsistent nor plainly wrong, and thus they are conclusive ......
  • Cohen v. Cohen
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 6, 1967
    ...an injunction.' Since these findings are not mutually inconsistent or plainly wrong they are conclusive. Lawrence v. Board of Selectmen of Egremont, 350 Mass. 354, 357, 214 N.E.2d 893. The principles governing cases of this sort have been fully set forth in Stevens v. Rockport Granite Co., ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT