Lawson v. City of Groves
| Decision Date | 22 November 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 7392,7392 |
| Citation | 487 S.W.2d 439 |
| Parties | Joel H. LAWSON, d/b/a Joel H. Lawson Heavy Equipment, Appellant, v. The CITY OF GROVES, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
A A DeLee, Port Arthur, for appellant.
Black & Black, Port Arthur, for appellee.
The City of Groves sued Joel H. Lawson, d/b/a Joel H. Lawson Heavy Equipment, for unpaid ad valorem taxes on personal property. Trial was to the court without a jury and judgment was entered for City from which taxpayer appeals. Various points of error are assigned, but both parties agree that the fundamental question is whether the personalty involved acquired tax situs other than the City of Groves.
The personalty involved is 'backhoes and dozers and cranes and draglines' which are used in operations outside the corporate limits of the city. Taxpayer's office, business and repair shop are within the corporate limits of the City of Groves, but apparently, except for repairs, this equipment is utilized elsewhere. There is suggestion from the record that some of the equipment, during the time at issue, may have been 'in the yard' but for this appeal we assume the equipment was only rarely, if ever, physically situated in the city limits.
Art. 8 § 11 of the Texas Constitution, Vernon's Ann.St., provides, in part: 'All property, whether owned by persons or corporations shall be assessed for taxation, and the taxes Paid in the county where situated.' (emphasis supplied)
The Charter of the City of Groves provides that personalty 'within the corporate limits of the City of Groves . . . shall be subject to taxation.'
It has been said that no taxing authority can exercise the power of taxation except as to property actually or constructively within its jurisdiction and that the common law principle of 'mobilia sequuntur personam' (personalty is taxable at the domicile of its owner, regardless of its actual location) is 'still the basic principle upon which the taxation of personal property rests.' Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. City of Austin, 112 Tex. 1, 243 S.W. 778, 781 (1922). However, this common law pronouncement has never been inflexibly applied in Texas. See Hardesty Bros. v. Fleming, 57 Tex. 395 (1882). See also 84 C.J.S. Taxation § 114 (1954).
The constitutional directive 'where situated' does not require its tax situs to be where physically located. City of Dallas v. Texas Prudential Insurance Co., 156 Tex. 36, 291 S.W.2d 693, 695 (1956).
In Texas, the rule is declared 'that tangible personal property acquires a tax situs in a jurisdiction apart from its owner if it is kept there with sufficient permanency that it may fairly be regarded as being a part of the general mass of property within the jurisdiction.' City of Dallas v. Overton, 363 S.W.2d 821, 825 (Tex.Civ.App., Dallas, 1962, error ref. n.r.e.). 'Permanent' means more or less permanent. Overton, supra, and authorities cited therein at p. 825. See City of Houston v. Western Equipment Rentals, Inc., 410 S.W.2d 805, 806 (Tex.Civ.App.,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Davis v. City of Austin
...1974, no writ); City of Bryan v. Texas Services, Inc., 499 S.W.2d 750 (Tex.Civ.App.-Waco 1973, writ ref'd n. r. e.); Lawson v. City of Groves, 487 S.W.2d 439 (Tex.Civ.App.-Beaumont 1972, no writ); Dennis v. City of Waco, 445 S.W.2d 56 (Tex.Civ.App.-Waco 1969, no writ); City of Dallas v. Ove......
-
Treadway v. Treadway
...S.W.2d 687 (Tex.Civ.App. Fort Worth 1977, no writ); Huntley v. Huntley, 512 S.W.2d 767 (Tex.Civ.App. Austin 1974, no writ); Lawson v. City of Groves, 487 S.W.2d 439 (Tex.Civ.App. Beaumont 1972, no writ); Schecter v. Folsom, 417 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.Civ.App. Dallas 1967, no writ); and Rhoades v. ......
-
Elite Towing, Inc. v. LSI Financial Group
... ... See City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin Auth., 589 S.W.2d 671, 678 (Tex.1979). The contentions in the ... ...
-
Starflight 50 v. Harris Cty Appraisal Dist.
...or not the property in question is "more or less permanent" depends upon factual situation in each case); see also Lawson v. City of Groves, 487 S.W.2d 439, 441 (Tex.Civ. App.-Beaumont 1972, no writ) (holding that question of tax situs is factual and dependent on situation in each case). Th......