Lawson v. Kirchner
Decision Date | 30 November 1901 |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Parties | LAWSON et al. v. KIRCHNER. |
DEBT TO INFANT—ACTION BY NEXT FRIENDOIL LEASE—CONSTRUCTION.
1. Where a debt or demand is payable to infants, suit therefor is properly brought in their names by their next friend, although the money, when recovered, goes to their guardian.
2. An oil lease for oil and gas purposes is a conveyance or sale of an interest in land, conditional and contingent on the discovery and reduction to possession of the oil or gas.
3. A person who accepts an oil or gas lease, with a stipulation therein contained to pay a monthly rental until a well is completed, or un-
til the expiration of a certain fixed term, is bound to pay such rental, although he does not, within such term, enter upon the land and complete such well, unless he was prevented from doing so by the plaintiffs, and not by mere personal default. (Syllabus by the Court.)
Error to circuit court, Tyler county; G. W. Fair, Judge.
Action by Harvey Lawson and others against W. E. Kirchner. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.
Engle & Riggle, for plaintiff in error.
Pugh & Pugh, J. V. Blair, and C. R. Martin, for defendants in error.
DENT, J. W. E. Kirchner complains of a judgment of the circuit court of Tyler county rendered against him on the 20th day of August, 1900, for the sum of $4,873.89, with interest and costs, at the suit of Harvey Lawson, an adult, who sues in his own right, and Ella Lawson, Maggie Lawson, James Lawson, and Calvin Lawson, infants, who sue by C. P. Tustin, their next friend. The questions presented are as follows: First, that the suit was improperly brought in the name of the infants by their next friend, but it should have been brought in his name as guardian; second, that the decree of the circuit court authorizing the leasing of the land for oil purposes was void, for the reason that the statute authorized the court to sell, and not to lease; third, that the defendant did not agree, and-is not bound by the conveyance of August 20, 1895, made to him by C. P. Tustin, guardian of the plaintiffs, to pay the rental therein stipulated to be paid, and for which this suit is brought. These questions were raised by demurrer to the declaration, pleas tendered, and motion to set aside the verdict. The decree confirming the lease is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Harvey Coal & Coke Co v. Dillon
...Steelsmith v. Gartlan, 45 W. Va. 27, 29 S. E. 978, 44 L. R. A. 107; Trees v. Eclipse Co., 47 W. Va. 107, 34 S. E. 933; Lawson v. Kirchner, 50 W. Va. 344, 40 S. E. 344; Lowther v. Miller-Libley Co., 53 W. Va. 501, 44 S. E. 433, 97 Am. St. Rep. 1027; Haskell v. Sutton, 53 W. Va. 206, 44 S. E.......
-
State v. Snyder
... ... 364.) A mineral lease ... authorizing the removal of coal, oil or gas, is a conveyance ... of a part of the property. ( Lawson v. Kirchner, 50 ... W.Va. 344; Blakley v. Marshall, 174 Pa. 425; Hopes ... Appeal, 3 A. 23; Wilson v. Youst, 43 W.Va. 826.) ... Care must be ... ...
-
Pryor Mountain Oil & Gas Co. v. Cross
... ... P. 6; defendant in error is ... without title; the lease conveyed an interest to lessee, ... Williamson v. Jones (W. Va.) 19 S.E. 436; Lawson ... v. Hirchner, (W. Va.) 40 S.E. 344; Wilson v. Yost, ... (W. Va.) 28 S.E. 781. An oil lease must be in writing, ... 4719 C. S., Thornton, 329 ... ...
-
Osborn v. Arkansas Territorial Oil & Gas Company
... ... 231, ... 19 S.E. 436: "The title is dependent on finding the gas ... by the purchaser in a limited time," and is inchoate ... See also Lawson v. Kirchner, 50 W.Va. 344, ... 40 S.E. 344 ... In the ... case of Mansfield Gas Co. v. Alexander, 97 ... Ark. 167, 133 S.W ... ...