Lawson v. Sigfrid
| Decision Date | 27 December 1927 |
| Docket Number | 11870. |
| Parties | LAWSON v. SIGFRID. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Department 2.
Error to District Court, San Miguel County; Straud M. Logan, Judge.
Action by Jacob A. Lawson against Carl J. Sigfrid. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
Affirmed.
L. C Kinikin, of Montrose, for plaintiff in error.
Moynihan Hughes & Knous, of Montrose, for defendant in error.
Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, and defendant in error as defendant. The former sued the latter (a lawyer) for damages arising from alleged neglect of professional duty. The trial court, at the close of plaintiff's evidence, sustained defendant's motion for a directed verdict. To review the judgment thereupon entered, this writ is prosecuted.
Bessie Kennedy owed plaintiff a sum of money, alleged to have been $820 on account stated. Suit therefor was begun in 1916. In 1919 defendant was first employed to collect, and it was agreed that as one step in inducing settlement by George W Wagner (whom Bessie Kennedy married) an amended complaint should be filed. Defendant never agreed, while this cause was on the docket, to try it, but told plaintiff that if tried other counsel should be employed for that purpose. A motion to make the amended complaint more specific was filed but never called up. In 1923, no settlement having been effected defendant finally agreed to try the case. It later developed that at the time of such agreement, and unknown to either of the parties, the cause had been dismissed under rule of court for failure to prosecute. Defendant filed a motion to vacate the order of dismissal, and that motion was overruled. Thereafter this action was brought in which plaintiff sought to recover the alleged amount of the Bessie Kennedy indebtedness, court costs in the former action, and certain expenses in relation thereto. In directing a verdict therein the trial court held that plaintiff must prove: (1) That defendant was negligent; (2) that plaintiff had a good cause of action against Mrs. Wagner; (3) that if plaintiff had obtained judgment in the case it could have been executed; (4) that as to the latter plaintiff's proof had failed.
From this record it is clear that defendant was not negligent in his efforts to make collection; that he first agreed to prosecute the Wagner suit after it had been dismissed; that Bessie Kennedy had not agreed to pay the sum claimed, but only to endeavor to induce her prospective husband to do so; and that shortly prior to defendant's employment Bessie Kennedy was insolvent.
Plaintiff here contends: (1) That the burden was on defendant to show Mrs. Wagner's...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.
...v. Lawton, 187 Cal.App.2d 657, 10 Cal.Rptr. 98 (1960); Campbell v. Magana, 184 Cal.App.2d 751, 8 Cal.Rptr. 32 (1960); Lawson v. Sigfrid, 83 Colo. 116, 262 P. 1018 (1927); McDow v. Dixon, 138 Ga.App. 338, 339, 226 S.E.2d 145, 147 (1976); Kohler v. Woollen, Brown & Hawkins, 15 Ill.App.3d 455,......
-
Kituskie v. Corbman
...257 F.Supp. 63 (E.D.Tenn.), aff'd, 385 F.2d 869 (6th Cir.1967); Hammons v. Schrunk, 209 Or. 127, 305 P.2d 405 (1956); Lawson v. Sigfrid, 83 Colo. 116, 262 P. 1018 (1927).7 See Smith v. Haden, 868 F.Supp. 1 (D.D.C.1994), aff'd 69 F.3d 606 (D.C.Cir.1995); Teodorescu v. Bushnell, Gage, Reizen ......
-
Hansen v. Wightman
...disclose information to the lawyer. See Martin v. Hall, 20 Cal.App.3d 414, 97 Cal.Rptr. 730, 53 A.L.R.3d 719 (1971); Lawson v. Sigfrid, 83 Colo. 116, 262 P. 1018 (1927). The instructions properly placed the burden of proving the attorneys' negligence upon the clients and the burden of showi......
-
Gallegos v. Lehouillier
...question in this case. The mystery concerns a ninety-year-old, one-and-one-quarter-page Colorado Supreme Court case, Lawson v. Sigfrid , 83 Colo. 116, 262 P. 1018 (1927).¶ 26 Courts from other jurisdictions and some commentators have cited Lawson for the proposition that a plaintiff in a ......
-
Attorney Liability for Examination and Certification of Title to Real Estate
...17. See, Happy Canyon Inv. Co. v. Title Ins. Co. of Minn., 38 Colo.App. 385, 560 P.2d 839 (1977). 18. 471 S.W.2d 705 (Ky. 1971). 19. 83 Colo. 116, 262 P. 1018 (1927). 20. Legal Malpractice, supra, note 1 at §§ 605-606. 21. See, Wlodarek, supra, note 1 and Boecher v. Borth, 51 App.Div.2d 598......
-
Legal Malpractice Forum
...1293 (1973). 9. Ishmael v. Millington, 241 Cal. App.2d 520, 50 Cal. Rptr. 592 (1966). 10. Coon v. Ginsberg, Id. 11. Lawson v. Sigfred, 83 Colo. 116, 262 P. 1018 (1927). 12. Coon v. Ginsberg, Id. This month's column was written by A. Craig Fleishman, Denver, a partner of the firm of Atler, Z......
-
Proximate Causation in Colorado Legal Malpractice Litigation
...Bebo Constr. Co., supra, note 1 at 83; Brown, supra, note 23 at 192; Tripp, supra, note 23. 35. Morris, supra, note 23; Lawson v. Sigfrid, 83 Colo. 116, 262 P. 1018 36. Miller, supra, note 23 at 579. 37. Mallen and Smith, supra, note 24, § 33.8 at 70. 38. Id. 39. Lawson, supra, note 35 at 1......