Lawton v. Howard (In re Horton), 13–AP–106.
| Decision Date | 29 October 2013 |
| Docket Number | No. 13–AP–106.,13–AP–106. |
| Citation | 137 Ohio St.3d 1236,1 N.E.3d 413 |
| Parties | In re Disqualification of HORTON. Lawton v. Howard. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
{¶ 1} Plaintiff Norman H. Lawton has filed an affidavit with the clerk of this court under R.C. 2701.03 seeking to disqualify Judge Timothy S. Horton from presiding over any further proceedings in case No. 12–CV–005403 in the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County.
{¶ 2} Lawton alleges that Judge Horton abused his discretion by dismissing Lawton's case on jurisdictional grounds. Lawton further states that on October 16, 2013, he appealed Judge Horton's decision, and therefore there is a “possibility” that the case may be remanded to Judge Horton.
{¶ 3} Under R.C. 2701.03(A), the chief justice's statutory authority to order disqualification of judges extends only to those matters in which “a proceeding [is] pending before the court.” Thus, “the chief justice cannot rule on an affidavit of disqualification when * * * nothing is pending before the trial court.” In re Disqualification of Hayes, 135 Ohio St.3d 1221, 2012-Ohio-6306, 985 N.E.2d 501, ¶ 6;see also In re Disqualification of Grossmann, 74 Ohio St.3d 1254, 1255, 657 N.E.2d 1356 (1994) (). Here, Lawton admits that he appealed Judge Horton's entry dismissing the underlying case and that his appeal is pending in the court of appeals. Because Lawton has failed to identify any matter currently pending before the judge against whom the affidavit was filed, there is no basis to order disqualification under R.C. 2701.03.
{¶ 4} Lawton's affidavit of disqualification is therefore denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Motor Vehicle Dealers Bd. (In re Brown)
...ten years. Thus, there is no statutory basis to order disqualification of any judge in this case. See In re Disqualification of Horton, 137 Ohio St.3d 1236, 2013-Ohio-5761, 1 N.E.3d 413, ¶ 3.{¶ 4} Second, "[t]he constitutional and statutory responsibility of the Chief Justice in ruling on a......
-
State v. Thompson (In re Gorman)
...the judge against whom the affidavit was filed, there is no basis to order disqualification. See In re Disqualification of Horton, 137 Ohio St.3d 1236, 2013-Ohio-5761, 1 N.E.3d 413, ¶ 3.{¶ 6} Second, even if the case were currently pending before Judge Gorman, affiants have not set forth su......
-
Huntington Nat'l Bank v. Long (In re O'Donnell)
... ... 2701.03. See In re Disqualification of Horton , 137 Ohio St.3d 1236, 2013-Ohio-5761, 1 N.E.3d 413 (denying an affidavit ... ...
-
State v. Fultz (In re Selvaggio), 19-AP-046
...against whom the affidavit was filed, there is no basis to order disqualification under R.C. 2701.03. In re Disqualification of Horton , 137 Ohio St.3d 1236, 2013-Ohio-5761, 1 N.E.3d 413, ¶ 3.{¶ 5} The affidavit of disqualification is ...