Lazo v. State, 96-03237

Decision Date29 May 1998
Docket NumberNo. 96-03237,96-03237
Parties23 Fla. L. Weekly D1321 Gerardo LAZO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Jennifer Y. Fogle and Robert H. Dickinson, Jr., Assistant Public Defenders, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Scott A. Browne, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

We have reviewed each of Gerardo Lazo's contentions in support of reversing the judgment and sentence stemming from his conviction for aggravated battery with a firearm. We have considered each of the four issues Lazo has urged upon us. Thus, the trial court did not err in denying Lazo's motion for judgment of acquittal, in failing to conduct a Richardson hearing, and in rejecting Lazo's challenge to comments expressed by the prosecutor. We do find error in the assessment of costs and fees.

The $2 discretionary cost must be stricken because it was not pronounced orally at sentencing. See Thompson v. State, 667 So.2d 447 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

The $500 public defender lien must be stricken. It is not clear from the record whether Lazo agreed to the amount of the fee, and the trial court did not advise him that he could contest the amount of the fee. See Allmond v. State, 668 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

Affirmed in part; remanded with instructions consistent with this opinion.

QUINCE, J., and DOYEL, ROBERT L., Associate Judge, concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Waller v. State, 2D03-4029.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • September 28, 2005
    ...precedent. See Welch v. State, 724 So.2d 651 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Watson v. State, 718 So.2d 253 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Lazo v. State, 711 So.2d 1303 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Higdon v. State, 709 So.2d 572 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Wyatt v. State, 708 So.2d 655 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Likewise, our opinion to......
  • Giles v. State, 2D00-592.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 12, 2001
    ...his challenge for appellate review. We strike the $2 discretionary cost because it was not announced at sentencing. See Lazo v. State, 711 So.2d 1303 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We also strike the court facility fee because the trial court did not announce it at sentencing and gave no statutory aut......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT