Lazorko v. PA Hospital
| Decision Date | 26 December 2000 |
| Docket Number | HMO-PA,NORLIE-LAZORKO,Nos. 98-1776,A,NORLIE-LAZORK,RLIE-LAZORKO,RLIE-LAZORK,s. 98-1776 |
| Citation | 237 F.3d 242 |
| Parties | (3rd Cir. 2000) JONATHAN LAZORKO, Administrator of the Estate of PATRICIA NORLIE, a/k/a PATRICIA; JONATHAN LAZORKO, Personal Representative of PATRICIA v. PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL; INSTITUTE OF PENNSYLVANIA; DAVID E. NICKLIN, M.D.; UNIVERSITY CITY FAMILY MEDICINE; U.S. HEALTHCARE, t/a/ JONATHAN LAZORKO, Administrator of the Estate of PATRICIA NORLIE, a/k/a PATRICIA; JONATHAN LAZORKO, Personal Representative of PATRICIA, Appellants v. PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL; INSTITUTE OF PENNSYLVANIA; DAVID E. NICKLIN, M.D.; UNIVERSITY CITY FAMILY MEDICINE; U.S. HEALTH CARE, t/a/ JONATHAN LAZORKO, Administrator of the Estate of PATRICIA NORLIE, a/k/a PATRICIA; JONATHAN LAZORKO, Personal Representative of PATRICIA v. PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL; INSTITUTE OF PENNSYLVANIA; DAVID E. NICKLIN, M.D.; UNIVERSITY CITY FAMILY MEDICINE; U.S. HEALTH CARE, t/a//1777/1790 |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
99 cases
-
McSharry v. Unumprovident Corp.
...federal preemption and complete federal preemption are distinguishable concepts. Wright, 262 F.3d at 614-15; Lazorko v. Pennsylvania Hosp., 237 F.3d 242, 248, 250-51 (3rd Cir. 2000); In re U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 193 F.3d 151, 160 (3rd Cir.1999); Copling v. Container Store, Inc., 174 F.3d 59......
-
Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Co.
...W., Inc., 406 F.3d 453 (7th Cir.2005) (affirming Rule 11 sanctions imposed subsequent to a post-remand hearing); Lazorko v. Penn. Hosp., 237 F.3d 242, 247 (3d Cir.2000) (“Although the District Court relinquished jurisdiction over this case when it either dismissed or remanded all the claims......
-
Reifer v. Westport Ins. Corp.
...warrants particular consideration. 3. We review the underlying legal basis for remand under a de novo standard. Lazorko v. Pa. Hosp., 237 F.3d 242, 247 (3d Cir.2000). 4. Although Reifer's declaratory judgment claim was originally brought in state court under Pennsylvania law, the question o......
-
Difelice v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare
...an HMO is covered by section 502(a) and is therefore completely preempted. See, e.g., Pryzbowski, 245 F.3d at 273-75; Lazorko v. Pa. Hosp., 237 F.3d 242, 250 (3d Cir.2000); In re U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 193 F.3d 151, 162-63 (3d Cir.1999); Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 57 F.3d 350, 358 (3d ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
The circuitous journey to the patients' bill of rights: winners and losers.
...related to the plan and is, therefore, preempted). APPENDIX D State laws not preempted in cases post-Travelers See Lazorko v. Pa. Hosp., 237 F.3d 242, 249-50 (3d Cir. 2000) (holding "[b]ecause [plaintiffs] claim is one concerning the propriety of care rather than the administration of that ......
-
To preempt or not to preempt: HMO liability pre and post Pegram v. Herdrich.
...Cicio, 321 F.3d at 230. (140) See id. (141) Rubin-Schneiderman, 2003 WL 22019833 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). (142) Lazorko v. Pennsylvania Hospital, 237 F.3d 242 (3d Cir. 1999), cert. denied by Aetna U.S. Healthcare v. Lazorko, 533 U.S. 930, 121 S.Ct. 2552. 150 L.Ed.2d 719 (2001). (143) Id. at 245. (1......