League v. Back of The Net

Decision Date07 June 2011
Citation2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 05025,85 A.D.3d 737,925 N.Y.S.2d 555
PartiesLONG ISLAND JUNIOR SOCCER LEAGUE, respondent,v.BACK OF the NET, LTD., appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Louis F. Burke, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Leslie S. Wybiral and Amanda N. Miller of counsel), for appellant.Soffey & Soffey, Garden City, N.Y. (Joseph E. Soffey of counsel), for respondent.REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, PLUMMER E. LOTT, and LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), entered July 19, 2010, which denied its motion to preliminarily enjoin the plaintiff from engaging in conduct allegedly constituting violations of a stipulation of settlement dated January 9, 2002.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant operates a website primarily focused on youth soccer that features news and information, scores, schedules, and standings from various soccer leagues, including a youth soccer league operated by the plaintiff. Since 1999 the plaintiff has operated its own website containing similar information regarding its league.

In 2001 the plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant, and the action was settled pursuant to a so-ordered stipulation of settlement dated January 9, 2002. Paragraph 5 of the stipulation of settlement provides: Plaintiff acknowledges that defendant has a right to publish news and information concerning plaintiff on its Website including such items as scores, standings and events, all being subject to the laws of defamation and such other laws which may exist.” In April 2010, after the plaintiff took measures to prevent the defendant from electronically accessing the raw data on the plaintiff's internet servers, the defendant moved to preliminarily enjoin the plaintiff from taking these measures, asserting that the plaintiff was in violation of paragraph 5 of the stipulation of settlement.

“A stipulation of settlement is a contract, enforceable according to its terms. When a court enforces a stipulation of settlement , it must effectuate the parties' intent. As with any contract, where the terms of a stipulation of settlement are unambiguous, the Supreme Court must give effect to the parties' intent based upon the plain meaning of the words used by the parties ( Alshawhati v. Zandani, 82 A.D.3d 805, 807, 918 N.Y.S.2d 173 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Linsalato v. Giuttari, 59 A.D.3d 682, 683, 874 N.Y.S.2d 212; McKenzie v. Vintage Hallmark, PLC, 302 A.D.2d 503, 504, 755 N.Y.S.2d 288).

Here, the plain meaning of paragraph 5 of the stipulation of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Giuffre Motor Car Co. v. Kia Motors Am., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • September 29, 2016
    ...547, 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015) (quoting Stein v. Stein, 12 N.Y.S.3d 284, 286 (App. Div. 2015)); Long Island Junior Soccer League v. Back of Net, Ltd., 925 N.Y.S.2d 555, 556 (App. Div. 2011) (same (quoting Alshawhati, 918 N.Y.S.2d at 175)). Prior to agreeing to the Interim Agreement, Plainti......
  • 12 New St., LLC v. Nat'l Wine & Spirits, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 8, 2021
    ...in denying plaintiff's motion for leave to submit such supplemental evidence (see Long Is. Jr. Soccer League v. Back of the Net, Ltd., 85 A.D.3d 737, 738, 925 N.Y.S.2d 555 [2011] ; 2 North Street Corp v. Getty Saugerties Corp., 68 A.D.3d 1392, 1396, 892 N.Y.S.2d 217 [2009], lv denied 14 N.Y......
  • MBR Contracting, Inc. v. Atakhanian
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 10, 2016
    ...605, 12 N.Y.S.3d 284 ; Bethea v. Thousand, 127 A.D.3d 798, 799, 6 N.Y.S.3d 584 ; Long Is. Jr. Soccer League v. Back of the Net, Ltd., 85 A.D.3d 737, 737, 925 N.Y.S.2d 555 ; McKenzie v. Vintage Hallmark, 302 A.D.2d 503, 504, 755 N.Y.S.2d 288 ).Here, the record demonstrates that the defendant......
  • People v. Reynolds
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 7, 2011
    ...into question the voluntariness of the defendant's plea ( see People v. Seeber, 4 N.Y.3d 780, 781, 793 N.Y.S.2d 826, 826 N.E.2d 797; [925 N.Y.S.2d 555] People v. Kulmatycski, 83 A.D.3d 734, 920 N.Y.S.2d 670; People v. Martinez, 78 A.D.3d 966, 967, 910 N.Y.S.2d 684). The defendant's claim th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT