O'Leary v. U.S., 88-1133

Decision Date13 September 1988
Docket NumberNo. 88-1133,88-1133
Citation856 F.2d 1142
PartiesHarold Edwin O'LEARY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Harold Edwin O'Leary, Springfield, Mo., for appellant.

Kathianne Knaup Crane, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Harold E. O'Leary appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255.O'Leary pleaded guilty to mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1341 and now challenges the sufficiency of the underlying indictment.We affirm.

O'Leary's activities as the assistant controller of Southern Comfort Corporation led a federal grand jury to indict him on eight counts of federal mail fraud.The indictment stated that O'Leary defrauded Southern Comfort of over $905,000 and its right to loyal, faithful, and honest service by its employees.Further, the indictment described a scheme in which O'Leary, acting without authorization, used the mail to deposit Southern Comfort corporate funds into a subsidiary's account.O'Leary then transferred the funds from that account to his personal account.At the plea hearing, O'Leary admitted he had done the acts recited in the indictment as part of the scheme to defraud Southern Comfort of its money.The district court sentenced O'Leary, and O'Leary later filed this section 2255 motion.

In pleading guilty, a defendant admits all of the factual allegations made in the indictment.United States v. DiFonzo, 603 F.2d 1260, 1263(7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1018, 100 S.Ct. 672, 62 L.Ed.2d 648(1980);seeParrott v. Brewer, 421 F.2d 1386, 1388(8th Cir.1970)(per curiam).A defendant pleading guilty also waives all challenges that do not relate to jurisdiction.Camp v. United States, 587 F.2d 397, 399(8th Cir.1978);accordHayle v. United States, 815 F.2d 879, 881(2d Cir.1987).In order to establish a jurisdictional defect, O'Leary must show that the indictment on its face fails to state an offense.SeeDiFonzo, 603 F.2d at 1263.He has failed to do so.The indictment clearly specified that using the mail to deposit corporate funds into the subsidiary account was a necessary part of O'Leary's scheme.

In addition, McNally v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 2875, 97 L.Ed.2d 292(1987), does not provide a basis for overturning O'Leary's conviction.Although the scheme to defraud Southern Comfort of its right to loyal, faithful, and honest employees may not state an offense under McNally, seeid. at ---, 107 S.Ct. at 2881, the balance of the indictment charges a violation of the mail fraud statute.When "a fraud[ulent] scheme involves multiple objectives, some of which are insufficient...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
41 cases
  • Fireman v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • 15 Septiembre 1998
    ...had no original subject matter jurisdiction. See Ex Parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371, 376-77, 25 L.Ed. 717 (1880); O'Leary v. United States, 856 F.2d 1142, 1143 (8th Cir.1988). Fireman may raise this jurisdictional defect in a section 2255 motion, even when this claim was not raised on direct ap......
  • U.S. v. Welch, No. 01-4170.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 22 Abril 2003
    ...render the mail and wire fraud counts themselves insufficient so long as one theory remains viable. See, e.g., O'Leary v. United States, 856 F.2d 1142, 1143 (8th Cir. 1988). 27. In Scheidler, the Supreme Court held abortion opponents seeking to "shut down" abortion clinics did not commit ex......
  • Whitepipe v. Weber
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Dakota
    • 29 Noviembre 2007
    ...should have been suppressed and that the prosecutor committed a Brady violation were waived by his guilty plea. O'Leary v. United States, 856 F.2d 1142, 1143 (8th Cir.1988) (a defendant who pleads guilty "waives all challenges that do not relate to jurisdiction"). Both claims were either ab......
  • U.S. v. Johnson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • 16 Diciembre 2005
    ...type of jurisdictional defect occurs when `the indictment on its face fails to state an offense.'") (quoting O'Leary v. United States, 856 F.2d 1142, 1143 (8th Cir.1988)), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 902, 117 S.Ct. 256, 136 L.Ed.2d 182 (1996). Thus, Johnson has made challenges to the sufficiency......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT