Leavell v. Bank of Commerce, 67120

Decision Date31 January 1984
Docket NumberNo. 67120,67120
Citation169 Ga.App. 626,314 S.E.2d 678
PartiesLEAVELL et al. v. BANK OF COMMERCE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

David S. Marotte, Marietta, for appellants.

Hansell L. Smith, Marietta, for appellee.

SOGNIER, Judge.

The Bank of Commerce (the Bank) sued Max and Henrietta Leavell on a note. Liability on the note was admitted and the two issues at the non-jury trial were interest and attorney fees. Following a judgment favorable to the Bank, the Leavells appeal.

1. Appellants contend that the trial court erred in awarding interest at the contract rate of 20% until the date of trial. There was no error. Hartsfield Co. v. Demos, 174 Ga. 43, 44-45, 162 S.E. 138 (1931).

2. Appellants contend that the trial court erred by failing to apply Tennessee law to the issue of attorney fees and by awarding attorney fees. Appellants executed the note in Tennessee and used the proceeds to buy land in Georgia. The note provided for payment of "reasonable expenses of collection, legal or otherwise ..." in the event of default. The trial court admitted appellant's evidence of Tennessee case law on attorney fees, as well as testimony by an expert witness for appellee as to the law in Tennessee concerning attorney fees. The trial court ultimately awarded attorney fees according to OCGA § 13-1-11(a)(2) (Code Ann. § 20-506), which sets forth percentages of the principal and interest to be awarded where the note provides for reasonable attorney fees without specifying any specific percent.

Appellant did not offer into evidence any Tennessee statute on this question, and appellee's expert witness testified that there was no Tennessee statute setting forth percentages to be deemed "reasonable" attorney fees. Thus, the common law governs the case, and this being so, it must be the common law as interpreted by the courts of Georgia and not of Tennessee. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Evans, 56 Ga.App. 336, 337(3), 192 S.E. 483 (1937). See Motz v. Alropa Corp., 192 Ga. 176(1), 15 S.E.2d 237 (1941); Gorman v. Griffin, 70 Ga.App. 585(2), 28 S.E.2d 897 (1944). As Georgia has codified its common law on the subject, the trial court did not err in applying OCGA § 13-1-11(a)(2) (Code Ann. § 20-506) and awarding attorney fees according to its provisions.

Judgment affirmed.

QUILLIAN, P.J., and POPE, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Coon v. Med. Ctr., Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 6, 2017
    ...; Risdon Enters., Inc. v. Colemill Enters., Inc. , 172 Ga.App. 902, 904-905, 324 S.E.2d 738 (1984) ; Leavell v. Bank of Commerce , 169 Ga.App. 626, 626-627, 314 S.E.2d 678 (1984) ; Oliver v. Aetna Ins. Co. , 102 Ga.App. 89, 89-90, 115 S.E.2d 647 (1960) ; Kirkpatrick v. J.C. Bradford & Co. ,......
  • Singletary v. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • September 13, 1993
    ...and in precise terms, relates solely to property damages will be enforced according to its terms. 5 See also Leavell v. Bank of Commerce, 169 Ga.App. 626, 314 S.E.2d 678 (1984) ("Appellants did not offer into evidence any Tennessee statute on this question attorney fees, and appellee's expe......
  • Raintree Trucking Co. v. FIRST AMERICAN INS.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 28, 2000
    ...and punctuation omitted.) Avnet, Inc. v. Wyle Laboratories, 263 Ga. 615, 621(3), 437 S.E.2d 302 (1993). 2. Leavell v. Bank of Commerce, 169 Ga.App. 626(2), 314 S.E.2d 678 (1984). 3. (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Protective Life Ins. Co. v. Robinson, 193 Ga.App. 316, 317(1), 387 S.E.2......
  • Malloy v. Cauley
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 31, 1984
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT