Ledezma-Cosino v. Lynch, 12-73289
| Decision Date | 12 October 2016 |
| Docket Number | No. 12-73289,12-73289 |
| Citation | 839 F.3d 805 (Mem) |
| Parties | Salomon Ledezma–Cosino, aka Cocino Soloman Ledesma, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Ledezma-Cosino v. Sessions
...v. Lynch , 819 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2016). Upon grant of rehearing en banc, the panel's opinion was vacated. Ledezma-Cosino v. Lynch , 839 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2016) (order).STANDARDS OF REVIEW We review the agency's factual findings for substantial evidence. Angov v. Lynch , 788 F.3d 893, 898......
-
Hendrick v. Caldwell, Civil Action No. 7:16CV00095
...is inapplicable for at least three reasons. First, the Ninth Circuit granted a petition for a rehearing en banc. Ledezma–Cosino v. Lynch , 839 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2016). In doing so, the Ninth Circuit stated, "The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court o......