Lee v. Lee, 81-1370

Decision Date16 December 1981
Docket NumberNo. 81-1370,81-1370
Citation407 So.2d 366
PartiesRobert J. LEE, Petitioner, v. Orie N. LEE, Jr., Lillian C. Lee, and Lillian C. Lee and Sons, a generalpartnership, Respondents.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Joseph E. Foster of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, Orlando, for petitioner.

John A. Sutton, Orlando, for respondent Orie N. Lee, Jr.

Donald R. Corbett, Orlando, for respondent Lillian C. Lee.

COWART, Judge.

Petitioner, plaintiff in a suit for dissolution of a partnership, petitions this court for a writ of common law certiorari to review the trial court's non-final order denying his motion for appointment of a receiver.

The appointment of a receiver is an ancillary remedy, is not a matter of right and rests in the sound judicial discretion of the equity judge. A trial judge who has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter can consider the matter and, correctly or erroneously, grant or deny the appointment of a receiver without permitting irreparable injury and without departing from procedural due process and thus without departing from the essential requirements of law. In such case, as here, review by certiorari should be denied. See The Hawaiian Inn of Daytona Beach, Inc. v. Snead Const. Corp., 393 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). The petition for certiorari is

DENIED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and SHARP, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Lucas
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 7 de abril de 1982
    ...(Fla. 2d DCA 1980); King v. Thompson and McKinnon, Auchincloss, Kohlmeyer, Inc., 352 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).3 See Lee v. Lee, 407 So.2d 366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). ...
  • Spector v. Old Town Key West Development, Ltd.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 9 de outubro de 1990
    ...receiver, provides only an ancillary remedy for the enforcement of the substantive claims asserted in the proceeding, see Lee v. Lee, 407 So.2d 366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); 44 Fla.Jur.2d Receivers § 2 (1984), and thus cannot by definition be said to constitute "the underlying major question in ......
  • Twinjay Chambers Partnership v. Suarez, 88-00388
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 9 de fevereiro de 1990
    ...the receiver has obtained possession does not support an appeal from the denial of the appointment of a receiver. See Lee v. Lee, 407 So.2d 366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (declining review by certiorari of order denying appointment of receiver). Because Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130 do......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT