Lee v. Southeastern Plumbing Supply Co.

Decision Date14 February 1979
Docket NumberNo. 34292,34292
Citation252 S.E.2d 905,243 Ga. 128
PartiesLEE v. SOUTHEASTERN PLUMBING SUPPLY COMPANY.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Louis F. McDonald, Atlanta, for appellant.

Whitfield C. Smith, Decatur, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The issue here is res judicata. The appellant filed an equitable petition in the DeKalb Superior Court to set aside a default judgment (entered in the State Court of Fulton County) on the ground that it was obtained by fraud. Prior to the equitable suit, the appellant had filed an extraordinary motion for new trial in the State Court of Fulton County to set aside the default judgment. See Simpson v. Bradley, 189 Ga. 316, 5 S.E.2d 893 (1939); Lucas v. Lucas, 179 Ga. 821, 177 S.E. 684 (1934). The motion for new trial was overruled and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Lee v. Southeastern Plumbing Supply Co., 145 Ga.App. 465, 244 S.E.2d 33 (1978).

The trial court did not err in dismissing the equitable petition. Lewis v. Lewis, 228 Ga. 703(3), 187 S.E.2d 872 (1972).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except HILL, J., who concurs in the judgment only.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Flanders v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 22 Mayo 1984
    ...50, 51, 162 S.E.2d 793 (1968); Miller v. Columbus, Ga., 229 Ga. 234(1), 190 S.E.2d 535 (1972). See also Lee v. Southeastern Plumbing etc. Co., 243 Ga. 128, 252 S.E.2d 905 (1979). Appellant does not controvert the facts in Simon, In order for the doctrine of res judicata to apply, there are ......
  • Simmons v. Simmons
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 14 Febrero 1979

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT