Leifer v. Leifer
| Decision Date | 19 November 1956 |
| Citation | 157 N.Y.S.2d 908,2 A.D.2d 898 |
| Parties | Sylvia LEIFER, Respondent, v. Mayer LEIFER, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Jesse Moss, New York City, for appellant.
Samuel Goldstein, Brooklyn, for respondent.
In a separation action the appeal is from an order which, inter alia, adjudges appellant in contempt of court for failure to comply with the provisions in a judgment of separation, as amended, which require him to make certain payments for the support of respondent and the issue of the marriage, and to pay a counsel fee. Order affirmed, without costs, on the authority of Altschuler v. Altschuler, 246 App.Div. 779, 284 N.Y.S. 93, and Dube v. Dube, 230 App.Div. 494, 245 N.Y.S. 287. If respondent has violated the terms of the judgment, as amended, with respect to appellant's right of visitation, a proper remedy lies in a motion to amend the judgment with respect to the provisions requiring him to make payments for support. Altschuler v. Altschuler, supra; Dube v. Dube, supra.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Abreu v. Abreu
...983, 48 L.R.A. 679, affd. 181 U.S. 183, 21 S.Ct. 555, 45 L.Ed. 810; Sterns v. Stevans, 11 A.D.2d 726, 204 N.Y.S.2d 623; Leifer v. Leifer, 2 A.D.2d 898, 157 N.Y.S.2d 908; Fox v. Fox, 273 App.Div. 895, 77 N.Y.S.2d 90; Smith v. Smith, 255 App.Div. 652, 9 N.Y.S.2d 188; Altschuler v. Altschuler,......
-
Greene v. Greene
...983, 48 L.R.A. 679, affd. 181 U.S. 183, 21 S.Ct. 555, 45 L.Ed. 810; Sterns v. Stevans, 11 A.D.2d 726, 204 N.Y.S.2d 623; Leifer v. Leifer, 2 A.D.2d 898, 157 N.Y.S.2d 908; Fox v. Fox, 273 App.Div. 895, 77 N.Y.S.2d 90; Smith v. Smith, 255 App.Div. 652, 9 N.Y.S.2d 188; Altschuler v. Altschuler,......
-
Hambleton v. Palmer
...conditioned upon visitation rights and the support provisions accordingly must prevail, until the decree is modified. (Leifer v. Leifer, 2 A.D.2d 898(18) 157 N.Y.S.2d 908.) It is held here that the respondent is not relieved of the duty to pay support under the provisions of the divorce dec......
-
Pollock v. Pollock
...have applied to the court for such modification of the decree. Sterns v. Stevens, 11 A.D.2d 726, 204 N.Y.S.2d 623; Leifer v. Leifer, 2 A.D.2d 898, 157 N.Y.S.2d 908; Schreck v. Schreck, 283 App.Div. 967, 130 N.Y.S.2d 432, 434. Without such a modification of the original decree, the removal o......