Lenard v. New York University Medical Center
| Decision Date | 17 August 1981 |
| Parties | Jadwiga (Jean) LENARD, Individually, etc., Appellant, v. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER (UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL), Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Fuchsberg & Fuchsberg, New York City (Norman E. Frowley, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Bower & Gardner, New York City (Steven J. Ahmuty, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
Before DAMIANI, J. P., and TITONE, MANGANO and GIBBONS, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In a medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 10, 1980, as granted defendant's motion to vacate that portion of plaintiff's notice for discovery and inspection which sought certain review committee reports and minutes.
Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements.
Plaintiff seeks discovery of the minutes and reports of review committee meetings, arguing that because the members of these committees are the agents and employees of the defendant hospital, the exception to section 6527 (subd. 3) of the Education Law applies. That exception permits the discovery of the statements of parties to an action who were in attendance at the review committee meetings. We decline to adopt this overly broad interpretation. By enacting section 6527 of the Education Law, the Legislature sought to provide a certain degree of confidentiality for medical review committee meetings. Although the statements of individual committee members would be discoverable when they are named as parties to the action, to expose the statements of all members to discovery whenever the hospital itself is named as a party would inhibit the free and open discussion at these meetings which the Legislature sought to encourage by enacting the statute.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Slotnik v. State
...that free and open discussion concerning the improvement of health care would not be discouraged. (See Lenard v. New York Univ. Med. Center [Univ. Hosp.], 83 A.D.2d 860, 442 N.Y.S.2d 30.) However, the confidentiality created by this is not absolute. Specifically "the proceedings ... [and] r......
-
Bellamy v. State
...parties to the action for purposes of the exception in Education Law § 6527(3) (see Lenard v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr. [Univ. Hosp.], 83 A.D.2d 860, 860–861, 442 N.Y.S.2d 30 [1981] ). Claimants' contention that defendant does not gain the benefit of the quality assurance privilege because t......
-
St. Elizabeth's Hosp. v. State Bd. of Professional Medical Conduct
...public at large (see, Matter of Albany Med. Center Hosp. v. Denis, 161 A.D.2d 1030, 557 N.Y.S.2d 523; Lenard v. New York Univ. Med. Center [Univ. Hosp.], 83 A.D.2d 860, 442 N.Y.S.2d 30; see also, Burrows, Incident Reporting: A Hospital's Conflicting Obligations Resolved, 58 NY State Bar J 1......
-
Daly v. Genovese
... ... Marine Park Chiropractic Center, 81 A.D.2d 570, 437 N.Y.S.2d 422; Rockwood Nat. Corp. v ... review proceedings by individual parties to a medical malpractice action, regarding the subject matter of that ... of Newburgh, 91 A.D.2d 674, 457 N.Y.S.2d 128; Lenard v. New York Univ. Med. Center [Univ. Hosp.], 83 A.D.2d ... ...